Department of Social Psychology and Psychology of Religion, Institute of Psychology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950, Lublin, Poland.
J Relig Health. 2012 Jun;51(2):419-30. doi: 10.1007/s10943-010-9367-2.
The present research investigates the relationship between anxiety and the religiosity dimensions that Wulff (Psychology of religion: classic and contemporary views, Wiley, New York, 1991; Psychology of religion. Classic and contemporary views, Wiley, New York, 1997; Psychologia religii. Klasyczna i współczesna, Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa, 1999) described as Exclusion vs. Inclusion of Transcendence and Literal vs. Symbolic. The researchers used the Post-Critical Belief scale (Hutsebaut in J Empir Theol 9(2):48-66, 1996; J Empir Theol 10(1):39-54, 1997) to measure Wulff's religiosity dimensions and the IPAT scale (Krug et al. 1967) to measure anxiety. Results from an adult sample (N = 83) suggest that three dimensions show significant relations with anxiety. Orthodoxy correlated negatively with suspiciousness (L) and positively with guilt proneness (O) factor-in the whole sample. Among women, Historical Relativism negatively correlated with suspiciousness (L), lack of integration (Q3), general anxiety and covert anxiety. Among men, Historical Relativism positively correlated with tension (Q4) and emotional instability (C), general anxiety, covert anxiety and overt anxiety. External Critique was correlated with suspiciousness (L) by men.
本研究调查了焦虑与 Wulff(《宗教心理学:经典与现代观点》,Wiley,纽约,1991 年;《宗教心理学:经典与现代观点》,Wiley,纽约,1997 年;《宗教心理学:经典与现代观点》,Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne,华沙,1999 年)所描述的超越的排斥与包容、字面与象征这两个宗教维度之间的关系。研究人员使用后批判信仰量表(Hutsebaut 在《经验主义神学杂志》9(2):48-66,1996 年;《经验主义神学杂志》10(1):39-54,1997 年)来衡量 Wulff 的宗教维度,使用 IPAT 量表(Krug 等人,1967 年)来衡量焦虑。一项针对成年样本(N=83)的研究结果表明,三个维度与焦虑存在显著关系。正统与怀疑(L)呈负相关,与内疚易感性(O)呈正相关——在整个样本中。在女性中,历史相对论与怀疑(L)、缺乏整合(Q3)、一般焦虑和隐性焦虑呈负相关。在男性中,历史相对论与紧张(Q4)和情绪不稳定(C)、一般焦虑、隐性焦虑和显性焦虑呈正相关。外部批判与男性的怀疑(L)呈正相关。