Gruppen L D, Wisdom K, Anderson D S, Woolliscroft J O
Department of Postgraduate Medicine and Health Professions Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-0201.
Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9):674-80. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00013.
Although ambulatory care settings are being used increasingly in undergraduate clinical education, variability in the depth and breadth of students' contacts with basic medical problems may compromise the educational benefits of this teaching modality. The present study examines the nature of such variation and the educational effectiveness of ambulatory care education.
During the one-month ambulatory care component of the third-year internal medicine rotation at the University of Michigan Medical School, 43 students in 1989-90 and 1990-91 recorded the patient problems they saw at a hospital and satellite clinics. In addition, the students' diagnostic-recognition abilities were assessed before and after the component. The extents of the students' experiences in various categories of patient problems were quantified and correlated with their diagnostic abilities in relevant content areas.
The students saw many categories of problems but few instances in any given category. There were numerous and potentially worrisome gaps in their exposure to several typical ambulatory care problems. Although the students showed significant increases in diagnostic-recognition abilities, these increases were not correlated with the students' levels of experience in any of the relevant problem categories.
The variability and potentially worrisome gaps in the students' experiences in the ambulatory care settings studied are probably representative of students' experiences in such settings, and should be considered in the implementation and evaluation of educational experiences in ambulatory care.
尽管门诊护理环境在本科临床教育中的使用日益增加,但学生接触基本医疗问题的深度和广度存在差异,这可能会损害这种教学模式的教育效益。本研究探讨了这种差异的本质以及门诊护理教育的有效性。
在密歇根大学医学院内科三年级轮转的为期一个月的门诊护理阶段,1989 - 1990年和1990 - 1991年的43名学生记录了他们在医院和卫星诊所见到的患者问题。此外,在该阶段前后对学生的诊断识别能力进行了评估。对学生在各类患者问题上的经历程度进行了量化,并将其与他们在相关内容领域的诊断能力相关联。
学生们见到了许多类别的问题,但每个特定类别中的实例很少。他们在接触一些典型门诊护理问题方面存在众多且可能令人担忧的差距。尽管学生们的诊断识别能力有显著提高,但这些提高与学生在任何相关问题类别中的经验水平均无关联。
在所研究的门诊护理环境中,学生经历的变异性和可能令人担忧的差距可能代表了学生在这类环境中的经历,在门诊护理教育经历的实施和评估中应予以考虑。