Bentzen S M, Overgaard M, Overgaard J
Danish Cancer Society, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital.
Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(10):1373-6. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90004-y.
The discovery that certain genetic syndromes are associated with a high cellular radiosensitivity has stirred interest in the concept that radiosensitivity of persons in general should have a genetic component. This has motivated research into assays for prediction of cellular normal tissue radiosensitivity. If such an intrinsic factor were a major factor in the development of late normal tissue injury, this should be detectable as a correlation between the probability of developing injury in different tissues. This hypothesis is tested in a series of 229 patients treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy and evaluated with respect to a number of late endpoints 16 to 71 months after the end of treatment. In each patient, the presence of marked subcutaneous fibrosis and telangiectasia were evaluated in two different treatment areas: in a photon field underneath a 5-mm wax bolus and in an abutted electron field used for treating the chest wall. The use of two different doses per fraction and the fact that a single anterior photon field was used with the dose prescribed at the level of the mid-axilla, led to a substantial variation in total dose and dose per fraction in these patients. A non-tissue-specific patient-to-patient difference in radiosensitivity would cause higher than expected reactions in one treatment area to be correlated with higher than expected reactions in the other area. For each of the two endpoints, telangiectasia or subcutaneous fibrosis, patients experiencing stronger than expected reactions in one treatment area tended to do so in the other area as well. Thus, a strong host factor appears to exist for a specific endpoint. It is an open question whether this is explained by individual variability in intrinsic radiosensitivity, progression rate of injury or other. Contrary to this, no significant correlation was seen when pairing the two late end-points, fibrosis and telangiectasia. Thus, patients showing stronger than expected fibrosis developed on average marked telangiectasia with a probability well predicted from their total dose and dose per fraction. These findings suggest that an assay for clinical expression of late injury would have to be specific for that type of injury.
某些遗传综合征与高细胞放射敏感性相关这一发现,引发了人们对一般人群的放射敏感性应有遗传成分这一概念的兴趣。这推动了对预测细胞正常组织放射敏感性检测方法的研究。如果这样一个内在因素是晚期正常组织损伤发生发展的主要因素,那么这应该可检测为不同组织发生损伤概率之间的相关性。在一系列229例接受乳房切除术后放疗的患者中对这一假设进行了检验,并在治疗结束后16至71个月就多个晚期终点进行了评估。在每位患者中,在两个不同的治疗区域评估明显的皮下纤维化和毛细血管扩张的情况:在一个5毫米蜡块下的光子野以及用于治疗胸壁的毗邻电子野。每个分次使用两种不同剂量,并且使用单个前光子野且剂量在腋中线水平规定,导致这些患者的总剂量和分次剂量有很大差异。放射敏感性方面非组织特异性的患者间差异会导致一个治疗区域中高于预期的反应与另一个区域中高于预期的反应相关。对于毛细血管扩张或皮下纤维化这两个终点中的每一个,在一个治疗区域出现比预期更强反应的患者在另一个区域往往也如此。因此,对于特定终点似乎存在一个强大的宿主因素。这是否由内在放射敏感性的个体变异性、损伤进展速度或其他因素所解释,仍是一个悬而未决的问题。与此相反,在将纤维化和毛细血管扩张这两个晚期终点配对时未观察到显著相关性。因此,显示出比预期更强纤维化的患者平均出现明显的毛细血管扩张,其概率可根据他们的总剂量和分次剂量很好地预测。这些发现表明,针对晚期损伤临床表达的检测方法必须针对该类型损伤具有特异性。