Suppr超能文献

[聚氨酯或硅胶作为长期植入物材料——批判性评估]

[Polyurethane or silicone as long-term implant substance--a critical evaluation].

作者信息

Behrend D, Schmitz K P

机构信息

Medizinische Fakultät, Institut für Biomedizinische Technik und Med. Informatik, Universität Rostock.

出版信息

Biomed Tech (Berl). 1993 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):172-8. doi: 10.1515/bmte.1993.38.7-8.172.

Abstract

Long-term implants made from thermoplastic elastomers have a long history of clinical use. Among other rubber materials, such as polyolefin rubber, much of the demand for rubber-like biomaterials is met by silicone and polyurethane elastomers. The last two elastomers both have sufficient biocompatibility for long-term applications, but differ in terms of biodegradability. Inadequate resistance to degradation almost always leads to implant function loss, which may even threaten the patient's life. Long-term implantation studies in the rat show different mechanisms of biodegradation for polyurethane and silicone. Polyurethane shown deep fissures in the surface, compared with erosion of silicone surfaces. Mechanical and electrical parameters determined to evaluate degradation, additionally show differences in the extent of damage occurring.

摘要

由热塑性弹性体制成的长期植入物有着悠久的临床使用历史。在其他橡胶材料中,比如聚烯烃橡胶,对类橡胶生物材料的大部分需求由硅酮和聚氨酯弹性体满足。后两种弹性体对于长期应用都具有足够的生物相容性,但在生物降解性方面有所不同。降解抗性不足几乎总是会导致植入物功能丧失,这甚至可能威胁患者生命。在大鼠身上进行的长期植入研究表明,聚氨酯和硅酮的生物降解机制不同。与硅酮表面的侵蚀相比,聚氨酯表面出现了深深的裂缝。为评估降解而测定的机械和电学参数还显示出所发生损伤程度的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验