Robinson R
Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of Southampton.
BMJ. 1993 Oct 2;307(6908):859-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6908.859.
Decisions have to be made about allocating health resources. Currently the best economic evaluation method for doing this is cost-utility analysis. This compares the costs of different procedures with their outcomes measured in "utility based" units--that is, units that relate to a person's level of wellbeing. The most commonly used unit is the quality adjusted life year (QALY). QALYs are calculated by estimating the total life years gained from a procedure and weighting each year to reflect the quality of life in that year. To compare outcomes of different programmes the Rosser index is one measure that is widely used to assign quality of life scores to patients. Combined with a measure of life years gained from a procedure, this enables QALYs to be calculated and procedures ranked according to cost per QALY gained. In this article Ray Robinson explains the measures used and discusses how QALY league tables can be used to guide decisions on resource allocation.
必须做出关于分配卫生资源的决策。目前,进行此项工作的最佳经济评估方法是成本效用分析。该方法将不同治疗程序的成本与其以“基于效用”的单位衡量的结果进行比较,即与个人幸福水平相关的单位。最常用的单位是质量调整生命年(QALY)。QALY 通过估计从一种治疗程序中获得的总生命年数,并对每一年进行加权以反映该年的生活质量来计算。为了比较不同方案的结果,罗瑟指数是一种广泛用于为患者分配生活质量分数的衡量方法。将其与从一种治疗程序中获得的生命年数的衡量方法相结合,就能够计算出 QALY,并根据每获得一个 QALY 的成本对治疗程序进行排序。在本文中,雷·罗宾逊解释了所使用的衡量方法,并讨论了如何利用 QALY 排行榜来指导资源分配决策。