Zimbardo P G, LaBerge S, Butler L D
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, California 94305-2130.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1993 Aug;102(3):466-73. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.102.3.466.
This experiment compared the emotional, cognitive, and physiological responses of Ss experiencing induced physiological arousal with and without awareness of the source of their arousal. Nine highly hypnotizable Ss and 9 nonhypnotizable controls were used in a within-subjects design. Each S received posthypnotic suggestions for arousal (increases in heart and respiration rate) with and without amnesia for its source in a two-phase procedure. Only the hypnotizable Ss were expected to differ between conditions. As predicted, for the hypnotizable Ss, unexplained arousal produced significant and dramatic effects when compared with explained arousal, including misattributions. These results are considered within a conceptual framework of the role of discontinuous experiences in the development of psychopathological symptoms in normal persons.
本实验比较了处于诱发生理唤醒状态下的被试在知晓和不知晓唤醒源时的情绪、认知及生理反应。采用被试内设计,使用了9名高催眠易感性被试和9名非催眠易感性对照组。在一个两阶段程序中,每个被试接受关于唤醒的催眠后暗示(心率和呼吸频率增加),且有无对唤醒源的遗忘。仅预期高催眠易感性被试在不同条件下会存在差异。正如所预测的,对于高催眠易感性被试,与可解释的唤醒相比,无法解释的唤醒产生了显著且明显的效应,包括错误归因。这些结果是在一个关于不连续体验在正常人心理病理症状发展中所起作用的概念框架内进行考量的。