Van Denburg E J, Kurtz R M
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1989 Jan;37(1):15-30. doi: 10.1080/00207148908410530.
This study hypothesized that highly hypnotizable Ss who remained amnesic for posthypnotic suggestions to improve body attitude would show greater changes than Ss who were not amnesic. Ss given simulating instructions were used as a comparison group to assess experimental demands. 48 females were screened with the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (Shor & E. Orne, 1962) and assigned to one of 4 conditions: (a) high hypnotizable with amnesia suggestions, (b) high hypnotizable without suggested amnesia, (c) low hypnotizable simulators with amnesia, and (d) low hypnotizable simulators without suggested amnesia. A fifth group was formed of those high hypnotizable Ss who remembered the suggestion despite instructions to the contrary. The Body Attitude Scale (Kurtz, 1966) was administered prior to and 3 days after the experimental suggestions. Results generally demonstrated that high hypnotizable amnesic Ss manifested the greatest attitudinal and phenomenological changes as a result of the posthypnotic suggestion, although conclusions were tempered by performance of simulating Ss. The implications for hypnosis research and clinical practice are discussed.
本研究假设,对改善身体态度的催眠后暗示保持遗忘的高催眠性被试,与未遗忘的被试相比,会表现出更大的变化。给予模拟指令的被试作为对照组,以评估实验要求。用哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A式(肖尔和E. 奥恩,1962年)对48名女性进行筛选,并将她们分配到4种条件之一:(a)高催眠性且有遗忘暗示,(b)高催眠性但无遗忘暗示,(c)低催眠性模拟者且有遗忘,(d)低催眠性模拟者且无遗忘暗示。第五组由那些尽管接到相反指令却仍记得暗示的高催眠性被试组成。在实验暗示之前和之后3天,使用身体态度量表(库尔茨,1966年)进行测量。结果总体表明,高催眠性遗忘被试因催眠后暗示而表现出最大的态度和现象学变化,不过模拟被试的表现使结论有所缓和。文中还讨论了对催眠研究和临床实践的启示。