Savino M, Perugi G, Simonini E, Soriani A, Cassano G B, Akiskal H S
II Psychiatric Clinic, University of Pisa, Italy.
J Affect Disord. 1993 Jul;28(3):155-63. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(93)90101-o.
Although theoretical explanations for comorbidity in panic disorder (PD) abound in the literature, the complex clinical challenges of these patients have been neglected, especially where panic, obsessive-compulsive and 'soft' bipolar (e.g., hypomanic, cyclothymic and hyperthymic) conditions might co-exist. The aim of the present study has been to systematically explore the spectrum of intra-episodic and longitudinal comorbidity of 140 DSM-III-R PD patients--67.1% of whom concomitantly met the criteria for Agoraphobia--and who were consecutively admitted to the ambulatory service of the Psychiatric Clinic of the University of Pisa over a 2-year period. Comorbidity with strictly defined anxiety disorders--i.e., not explained as mere symptomatic extensions of PD--was relatively uncommon, and included Simple Phobia (10.7%), Social Phobia (6.4%), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (3.6%), and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (4.2%). Comorbidity with Major Depression--strictly limited to the melancholic subtype--occurred in 22.9%. Comorbidity with Bipolar Disorders included 2.1% with mania, 5% with hypomania, as well as 6.4% with cyclothymia, for a total of 13.5%; an additional 34.3% of PD patients met the criteria for hyperthymic temperament. We submit that such comorbid patterns are at the root of unwieldy clinical constructs like 'atypical depression' and 'borderline personality'. The relationship of panic disorder to other anxious-phobic and depressive states has been known for some time. Our data extend this relationship to soft bipolar disorders. Studies from other centers are needed to verify that the proposed new link is not merely due to referral bias to a tertiary university setting.
尽管恐慌症(PD)中共病的理论解释在文献中比比皆是,但这些患者复杂的临床挑战却一直被忽视,尤其是在恐慌、强迫和“软性”双相情感障碍(如轻躁狂、环性心境障碍和情感高涨)可能并存的情况下。本研究的目的是系统地探究140名DSM-III-R恐慌症患者发作期内和纵向共病的范围,其中67.1%的患者同时符合广场恐惧症的标准,这些患者在两年时间里连续被收治于比萨大学精神病诊所的门诊。与严格定义的焦虑症共病(即不能仅仅解释为恐慌症的症状延伸)相对少见,包括单纯恐惧症(10.7%)、社交恐惧症(6.4%)、广泛性焦虑症(3.6%)和强迫症(4.2%)。与重度抑郁症共病(严格限于抑郁亚型)的发生率为22.9%。与双相情感障碍共病包括2.1%的躁狂症、5%的轻躁狂症以及6.4%的环性心境障碍,总计13.5%;另有34.3%的恐慌症患者符合情感高涨气质的标准。我们认为,这种共病模式是“非典型抑郁症”和“边缘性人格”等难以处理的临床结构的根源。恐慌症与其他焦虑-恐惧症和抑郁状态的关系已为人所知有一段时间了。我们的数据将这种关系扩展到了软性双相情感障碍。需要其他中心的研究来验证所提出的新联系不仅仅是由于转诊到三级大学机构所导致的偏差。