• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陆地和水中运动时摄氧量与心率的比较。

Comparison of oxygen uptake and heart rate during exercises on land and in water.

作者信息

Johnson B L, Stromme S B, Adamczyk J W, Tennoe K O

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1977 Mar;57(3):273-8. doi: 10.1093/ptj/57.3.273.

DOI:10.1093/ptj/57.3.273
PMID:840905
Abstract

Oxygen comsumption and heart rate response during identical calisthenic-type exercises performed on land and in the water were compared in eight subjects. Both the heart rate and the oxygen uptake were greater during exercises in water. Although gravity is the primary resistance to movement on land, viscosity friction and turbulence are dominant resistive factors in the water. The results of this study indicate that the latter two factors provide a greater load during exercise than the resistance of gravity in land exercises. At a moderate rhythm of leg exercises, oxygen consumption increased about ten times over resting values in the water for men subjects and about seven times for women. Arm exercise performed in the water require less energy than leg exercises in water, but arm exercises require significantly more oxygen when performed in water than the same exercises performed on land.

摘要

对8名受试者在陆地上和水中进行相同的健身操类运动时的耗氧量和心率反应进行了比较。在水中运动时,心率和摄氧量都更高。虽然重力是陆地上运动的主要阻力,但粘性摩擦和湍流是水中的主要阻力因素。这项研究的结果表明,后两个因素在运动过程中提供的负荷比陆地运动中重力的阻力更大。在适度的腿部运动节奏下,男性受试者在水中的耗氧量比静息值增加了约10倍,女性增加了约7倍。在水中进行的手臂运动比在水中进行的腿部运动需要的能量少,但在水中进行手臂运动时比在陆地上进行相同运动需要显著更多的氧气。

相似文献

1
Comparison of oxygen uptake and heart rate during exercises on land and in water.陆地和水中运动时摄氧量与心率的比较。
Phys Ther. 1977 Mar;57(3):273-8. doi: 10.1093/ptj/57.3.273.
2
Cardiorespiratory responses of healthy subjects to calisthenics performed on land versus in water.
Phys Ther. 1992 Jul;72(7):532-8; discussion 539. doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.7.532.
3
Heart rate recovery improves after exercise in water when compared with on land.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Jul;38(4):721-724. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12464. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
4
Physiological adaptations to head-out aquatic exercises with different levels of body immersion.对不同身体浸入程度的头部露出水面的水上运动的生理适应。
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1255-9. doi: 10.1519/R-20896.1.
5
Training-induced increase in nitric oxide metabolites in chronic heart failure and coronary artery disease: an extra benefit of water-based exercises?训练诱导的慢性心力衰竭和冠状动脉疾病中一氧化氮代谢产物增加:水上运动的额外益处?
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Apr;16(2):215-21. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283292fcf.
6
Energy cost of rehabilitation calisthenics.康复健美操的能量消耗
Phys Ther. 1979 Jul;59(7):855-8. doi: 10.1093/ptj/59.7.855.
7
Influence of water immersion, water gymnastics and swimming on cardiac output in patients with heart failure.水浸、水中体操和游泳对心力衰竭患者心输出量的影响。
Heart. 2007 Jun;93(6):722-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.094870. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
8
Oxygen uptake and heart rate responses to treadmill and water running.跑步机跑步和水中跑步时的摄氧量及心率反应。
Can J Sport Sci. 1990 Jun;15(2):96-8.
9
Maximal and ventilatory thresholds cardiorespiratory responses to three water aerobic exercises compared with treadmill on land.最大和通气阈值心肺反应三种水上有氧运动与陆地跑步机比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jun;28(6):1679-87. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000304.
10
Technical note: Comparison of two methods to quantify exercise energy expenditure in trotters.
J Anim Sci. 2015 Mar;93(3):1145-8. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8153.

引用本文的文献

1
Exercise for people with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of land-based and aquatic interventions.髋或膝骨关节炎患者的运动:陆地干预与水上干预的比较
Open Access J Sports Med. 2010 Jul 23;1:123-35. doi: 10.2147/oajsm.s6941.
2
Exercise intensity of head-out water-based activities (water fitness).头部出水的水上活动(水中健身)的运动强度。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jul;109(5):829-38. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1419-5. Epub 2010 Mar 13.