Vu E T, Lee S C, Krasne F B
Department of Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles 90024.
J Neurosci. 1993 Oct;13(10):4379-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-10-04379.1993.
The excitability of crayfish escape behavior is seldom fully predictable. A major determinant of this fickleness is a form of descending inhibition that is reliably evoked during restraint or feeding and is called "tonic inhibition." Tonic inhibition was found to inhibit postsynaptically the lateral giant neurons, the command neurons for one form of escape. This inhibition is located on lateral giant dendrites that are electrotonically distant from the neuron's spike initiating zone. in contrast, the postsynaptic inhibition due to "recurrent inhibition," which prevents new escape responses from starting while a previously initiated one is in process, occurs proximally, near the spike initiating zone. The distalness of tonic inhibition could be an adaptation for selective suppression of parts of the lateral giant dendritic tree. Consistent with this, evidence was obtained that the tonic inhibitory system can suppress responses to specific sensory fields. An independent reason for targeting recurrent inhibition proximally and tonic inhibition distally was suggested by the functional requirements of each inhibitory process: recurrent inhibition needs to be "absolute" in the sense that the response should be absolutely prevented, whereas it must be possible to override tonic inhibition. Neuronal models demonstrated that proximal inhibition gives recurrent inhibition the required property of absoluteness while distal inhibition allows tonic inhibition to be overridden ("relativity"). It was shown that the relativity of distal inhibition arises from its interaction with the process of saturation of excitation and that tonic inhibition does indeed interact with excitatory saturation as predicted. It is suggested that the property of relativity of distal inhibition is exploited in other nervous systems as well.
小龙虾逃避行为的兴奋性很少能完全预测。这种多变性的一个主要决定因素是一种下行抑制形式,它在约束或进食过程中能可靠地诱发,被称为“紧张性抑制”。研究发现,紧张性抑制在突触后抑制外侧巨神经元,即一种逃避形式的指令神经元。这种抑制位于外侧巨树突上,这些树突在电紧张方面远离神经元的 spike 起始区。相比之下,“回返性抑制”引起的突触后抑制发生在近端,靠近 spike 起始区,它在先前启动的逃避反应进行时阻止新的逃避反应开始。紧张性抑制的远端性可能是对外侧巨树突树部分进行选择性抑制的一种适应。与此一致的是,有证据表明紧张性抑制系统可以抑制对特定感觉场的反应。每个抑制过程的功能需求提出了将回返性抑制定位在近端而将紧张性抑制定位在远端的一个独立原因:回返性抑制需要是“绝对的”,即反应应被绝对阻止,而必须有可能克服紧张性抑制。神经元模型表明,近端抑制赋予回返性抑制所需的绝对性,而远端抑制允许紧张性抑制被克服(“相对性”)。研究表明,远端抑制的相对性源于其与兴奋饱和过程的相互作用,并且紧张性抑制确实如预测的那样与兴奋性饱和相互作用。有人提出,远端抑制的相对性特性在其他神经系统中也有被利用。