• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤患者的损伤严重程度分级:一种基于国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)编码的简化技术。

Injury severity grading in trauma patients: a simplified technique based upon ICD-9 coding.

作者信息

Rutledge R, Fakhry S, Baker C, Oller D

机构信息

North Carolina Trauma Registry, North Carolina Memorial Hospital, Wake Medical Center/Area Health Education Center, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1993 Oct;35(4):497-506; discussion 506-7.

PMID:8411270
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The purpose of this study was to develop a simplified method of stratifying patient risk of death based on ICD-9 codes.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a statewide trauma registry. A mortality risk ratio (MRR) was derived from a "training" subset by calculating a mortality rate for each ICD-9 code of interest. The independent variables of interest included TS, ISS, and MRRs (for the 1st & 2nd Dx, 1st op, & E code).

RESULTS

(n = 37,100). When the 1st Dx and ISS were used as candidate variables in stepwise multivariate modeling, the MRR for the 1st Dx was the first variable to be entered into the model (1st Dx partial R2 = 0.37, ISS partial R2 = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the 1st Dx is a better predictor of outcome than ISS. Since ICD-9 codes are more easily obtained and are better predictors of outcome, this study suggests that they may supersede the use of the ISS in injury severity scoring.

摘要

未标注

本研究的目的是开发一种基于ICD - 9编码对患者死亡风险进行分层的简化方法。

方法

数据取自全州范围的创伤登记处。通过计算每个感兴趣的ICD - 9编码的死亡率,从一个“训练”子集中得出死亡率风险比(MRR)。感兴趣的自变量包括创伤评分(TS)、损伤严重度评分(ISS)以及MRR(用于首次诊断和第二次诊断、首次手术及E编码)。

结果

(n = 37100)。在逐步多变量建模中,当将首次诊断和ISS用作候选变量时,首次诊断的MRR是第一个进入模型的变量(首次诊断的偏R² = 0.37,ISS的偏R² = 0.02)。

结论

本研究表明,首次诊断比ISS更能预测预后。由于ICD - 9编码更容易获取且对预后的预测性更好,本研究提示它们可能会取代ISS在损伤严重度评分中的应用。

相似文献

1
Injury severity grading in trauma patients: a simplified technique based upon ICD-9 coding.创伤患者的损伤严重程度分级:一种基于国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)编码的简化技术。
J Trauma. 1993 Oct;35(4):497-506; discussion 506-7.
2
Prediction of mortality in pediatric trauma patients: new injury severity score outperforms injury severity score in the severely injured.小儿创伤患者死亡率的预测:新损伤严重程度评分在重伤患者中优于损伤严重程度评分。
J Trauma. 2003 Dec;55(6):1083-7; discussion 1087-8. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000102175.58306.2A.
3
The impact of injury coding schemes on predicting hospital mortality after pediatric injury.损伤编码方案对预测小儿损伤后医院死亡率的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):639-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00446.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
4
Patterns of injury and functional outcome after hanging: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.缢伤后的损伤模式及功能结局:国家创伤数据库分析
Am J Surg. 2005 Dec;190(6):836-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.051.
5
Comparative results of trauma scoring systems in fatal outcomes.创伤评分系统在死亡结局方面的比较结果。
Conn Med. 2009 May;73(5):261-5.
6
Incorporating recent advances to make the TRISS approach universally available.结合最新进展,使创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法普遍可用。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):1002-8; discussion 1008-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000215827.54546.01.
7
Validation of a relative head injury severity scale for pediatric trauma.儿童创伤相对头部损伤严重程度量表的验证
J Trauma. 2007 Jul;63(1):172-7; discussion 177-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31805c14b1.
8
Bayesian logistic injury severity score: a method for predicting mortality using international classification of disease-9 codes.贝叶斯逻辑斯蒂损伤严重度评分:一种使用国际疾病分类第9版编码预测死亡率的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 May;15(5):466-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00105.x.
9
The worst injury predicts mortality outcome the best: rethinking the role of multiple injuries in trauma outcome scoring.最严重的损伤对死亡率结局的预测最为准确:重新思考多发伤在创伤结局评分中的作用。
J Trauma. 2003 Oct;55(4):599-606; discussion 606-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000085721.47738.BD.
10
Comparison of the Injury Severity Score and ICD-9 diagnosis codes as predictors of outcome in injury: analysis of 44,032 patients.损伤严重程度评分与ICD - 9诊断编码作为损伤预后预测指标的比较:对44,032例患者的分析
J Trauma. 1997 Mar;42(3):477-87; discussion 487-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199703000-00016.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and need assessment of pediatric trauma outcome benchmarking tools for low-resource settings.低资源环境下儿科创伤结局基准工具的系统评价与需求评估
Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Mar;33(3):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-4024-9. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
2
Predictors of mortality in pediatric trauma: experiences of a level 1 trauma center and an assessment of the International Classification Injury Severity Score (ICISS).小儿创伤死亡率的预测因素:一级创伤中心的经验及国际疾病分类损伤严重程度评分(ICISS)评估
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Jul;32(7):657-63. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3900-7. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
3
Is the Kampala trauma score an effective predictor of mortality in low-resource settings? A comparison of multiple trauma severity scores.
坎帕拉创伤评分在资源匮乏地区是死亡率的有效预测指标吗?多种创伤严重程度评分的比较。
World J Surg. 2014 Aug;38(8):1905-11. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2496-0.
4
Systematic review of predictive performance of injury severity scoring tools.系统评价损伤严重程度评分工具的预测性能。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Sep 10;20:63. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-63.
5
The role of trauma scoring in developing trauma clinical governance in the Defence Medical Services.创伤评分在国防医疗服务中创伤临床治理发展中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 27;366(1562):171-91. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0232.
6
The sequential trauma score - a new instrument for the sequential mortality prediction in major trauma.序贯性创伤评分 - 一种用于预测严重创伤患者死亡率的新工具。
Eur J Med Res. 2010 May 18;15(5):185-95. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-5-185.
7
Accuracy of ICD-9-CM coding of cervical spine fractures: implications for research using administrative databases.国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD-9-CM)对颈椎骨折编码的准确性:对利用行政数据库进行研究的影响
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:101-5.
8
Injury Severity Score (ISS) vs. ICD-derived Injury Severity Score (ICISS) in a patient population treated in a designated Hong Kong trauma centre.香港某指定创伤中心收治患者群体的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)与国际疾病分类衍生的损伤严重程度评分(ICISS)对比
Mcgill J Med. 2008 Jan;11(1):9-13.
9
A statewide, population-based time-series analysis of the increasing frequency of nonoperative management of abdominal solid organ injury.一项基于全州人口的时间序列分析,关于腹部实性器官损伤非手术治疗频率的增加情况。
Ann Surg. 1995 Sep;222(3):311-22; discussion 322-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00009.