Suppr超能文献

香港某指定创伤中心收治患者群体的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)与国际疾病分类衍生的损伤严重程度评分(ICISS)对比

Injury Severity Score (ISS) vs. ICD-derived Injury Severity Score (ICISS) in a patient population treated in a designated Hong Kong trauma centre.

作者信息

Wong Sydney S N, Leung Gilberto K K

机构信息

Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Mcgill J Med. 2008 Jan;11(1):9-13.

Abstract

Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) has been the benchmark of mortality risk in trauma centers for over 30 years. TRISS utilizes the Injury Severity Score (ISS) as an index of anatomical injury. This study investigated the efficacy of a new type of index of anatomical injury called the ICD-derived Injury Severity Score (ICISS) compared to the ISS using a logistic regression analysis and a global chi-square test of the areas under the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves. We found that the empirically derived ICISS performed as well as the consensus derived ISS with no statistical differences between their respective area under the ROC curves.

摘要

创伤与损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)在创伤中心一直是30多年来死亡率风险的基准。TRISS使用损伤严重程度评分(ISS)作为解剖学损伤的指标。本研究使用逻辑回归分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的全局卡方检验,调查了一种新型解剖学损伤指标——国际疾病分类衍生损伤严重程度评分(ICISS)与ISS相比的有效性。我们发现,根据经验得出的ICISS与根据共识得出的ISS表现相当,其各自ROC曲线下面积之间无统计学差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be13/2322932/3046d733dc85/mjm11_1p9f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验