Suppr超能文献

香港某指定创伤中心收治患者群体的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)与国际疾病分类衍生的损伤严重程度评分(ICISS)对比

Injury Severity Score (ISS) vs. ICD-derived Injury Severity Score (ICISS) in a patient population treated in a designated Hong Kong trauma centre.

作者信息

Wong Sydney S N, Leung Gilberto K K

机构信息

Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Mcgill J Med. 2008 Jan;11(1):9-13.

Abstract

Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) has been the benchmark of mortality risk in trauma centers for over 30 years. TRISS utilizes the Injury Severity Score (ISS) as an index of anatomical injury. This study investigated the efficacy of a new type of index of anatomical injury called the ICD-derived Injury Severity Score (ICISS) compared to the ISS using a logistic regression analysis and a global chi-square test of the areas under the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves. We found that the empirically derived ICISS performed as well as the consensus derived ISS with no statistical differences between their respective area under the ROC curves.

摘要

创伤与损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)在创伤中心一直是30多年来死亡率风险的基准。TRISS使用损伤严重程度评分(ISS)作为解剖学损伤的指标。本研究使用逻辑回归分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的全局卡方检验,调查了一种新型解剖学损伤指标——国际疾病分类衍生损伤严重程度评分(ICISS)与ISS相比的有效性。我们发现,根据经验得出的ICISS与根据共识得出的ISS表现相当,其各自ROC曲线下面积之间无统计学差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be13/2322932/3046d733dc85/mjm11_1p9f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验