Grondin S
Université Laurentienne, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Percept Psychophys. 1993 Sep;54(3):383-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03205274.
Experiments 1 and 2 compared, with a single-stimulus procedure, the discrimination of filled and empty intervals in both auditory and visual modalities. In Experiment 1, in which intervals were about 250 msec, the discrimination was superior with empty intervals in both modalities. In Experiment 2, with intervals lasting about 50 msec, empty intervals showed superior performance with visual signals only. In Experiment 3, for the auditory modality at 250 msec, the discrimination was easier with empty intervals than with filled intervals with both the forced-choice (FC) and the single stimulus (SS) modes of presentation, and the discrimination was easier with the FC than with the SS method. Experiment 4, however, showed that at 50 and 250 msec, with a FC-adaptive procedure, there were no differences between filled and empty intervals in the auditory mode; the differences observed with the visual mode in Experiments 1 and 2 remained significant. Finally, Experiment 5 compared differential thresholds for four marker-type conditions, filled and empty intervals in the auditory and visual modes, for durations ranging from .125 to 4 sec. The results showed (1) that the differential threshold differences among marker types are important for short durations but decrease with longer durations, and (2) that a generalized Weber's law generally holds for these conditions. The results as a whole are discussed in terms of timing mechanisms.
实验1和实验2采用单刺激程序,比较了听觉和视觉通道中对有内容间隔和无内容间隔的辨别能力。在实验1中,间隔约为250毫秒,两种通道中对无内容间隔的辨别能力更强。在实验2中,间隔持续约50毫秒,只有在视觉信号中无内容间隔表现出更好的辨别能力。在实验3中,对于250毫秒的听觉通道,在强制选择(FC)和单刺激(SS)呈现模式下,对无内容间隔的辨别都比对有内容间隔更容易,且FC方法比SS方法更容易辨别。然而,实验4表明,在50毫秒和250毫秒时,采用FC自适应程序,听觉模式下有内容间隔和无内容间隔之间没有差异;实验1和实验2中在视觉模式下观察到的差异仍然显著。最后,实验5比较了四种标记类型条件下的辨别阈限,即听觉和视觉模式下有内容间隔和无内容间隔,持续时间从0.125秒到4秒。结果表明:(1)标记类型之间的辨别阈限差异在短持续时间内很重要,但随着持续时间延长而减小;(2)在这些条件下广义韦伯定律通常成立。整体结果从时间机制方面进行了讨论。