Duong A, Weingarten H P
Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Physiol Behav. 1993 Sep;54(3):449-54. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(93)90234-7.
We examined the relative contribution of dopamine (DA) receptors in the brain and periphery in the control of sham and real feeding of sucrose solutions. Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of pimozide, an antagonist of peripheral and brain DA receptors, suppressed both sham and real feeding in a dose-related manner. In contrast, IP injections of domperidone, a DA antagonist restricted to peripheral receptors, had no effect on either sham or real feeding. The inability of domperidone to influence sucrose intake did not result from a lack of biological activity of the drug because the identical doses of domperidone that failed to alter eating significantly inhibited gastric acid secretion. The results implicate central, but not peripheral, DA receptors in the control of the ingestion of palatable foods and also suggest that sham feeding is more sensitive to DA antagonism than real feeding.
我们研究了大脑和外周多巴胺(DA)受体在假饲和实际摄食蔗糖溶液控制中的相对作用。腹腔注射外周和脑DA受体拮抗剂匹莫齐特,以剂量相关的方式抑制假饲和实际摄食。相比之下,腹腔注射仅限于外周受体的DA拮抗剂多潘立酮,对假饲或实际摄食均无影响。多潘立酮无法影响蔗糖摄入并非由于药物缺乏生物活性,因为相同剂量的多潘立酮虽未能显著改变进食,但却能显著抑制胃酸分泌。结果表明,中枢而非外周DA受体参与了美味食物摄入的控制,并且还表明假饲比实际摄食对DA拮抗作用更敏感。