McClelland G H, Judd C M
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309-0345.
Psychol Bull. 1993 Sep;114(2):376-90. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376.
Although interaction effects are frequently found in experimental studies, field researchers report considerable difficulty in finding theorized moderator effects. Previous discussions of this discrepancy have considered responsible factors including differences in measurement error and use of nonlinear scales. In this article we demonstrate that the differential efficiency of experimental and field tests of interactions is also attributable to the differential residual variances of such interactions once the component main effects have been partialed out. We derive an expression for this residual variance in terms of the joint distribution of the component variables and explore how properties of the distribution affect the efficiency of tests of moderator effects. We show that tests of interactions in field studies will often have less than 20% of the efficiency of optimal experimental tests, and we discuss implications for the design of field studies.
尽管在实验研究中经常发现交互作用效应,但实地研究人员报告称,在发现理论上的调节效应方面存在相当大的困难。此前关于这种差异的讨论已经考虑了包括测量误差差异和非线性量表使用等相关因素。在本文中,我们证明,一旦剔除了各组成主效应,交互作用的实验检验和实地检验的效率差异也归因于此类交互作用的残差方差差异。我们根据组成变量的联合分布推导出了这种残差方差的表达式,并探讨了分布特性如何影响调节效应检验的效率。我们表明,实地研究中的交互作用检验效率往往不到最优实验检验效率的20%,并讨论了这对实地研究设计的启示。