Suppr超能文献

通过“靶心”图像评估心肌灌注缺损。

Evaluation of myocardial perfusion defects by means of "bull's eye" images.

作者信息

Minoves M, Garcia A, Magriña J, Pavia J, Herranz R, Setoain J

机构信息

C.E.T.I.R., Centre Medic de Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 1993 Jan;16(1):16-22. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960160104.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of so-called "bull's eye" imaging as a simplified display of tomographic slices in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 64 patients were studied at stress and at rest, by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), either with thallium-201 (201Tl) or with technetium-99m methoxy-isobutyl-isonitril (Tc-MIBI). The myocardial perfusion defects detected by bull's eye image alone and in combination with visual analysis of tomographic images were evaluated in all cases, taking coronary arteriographic results as a gold standard. The overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of CAD were as follows: bull's eye imaging, 100% and 70.8%; tomographic imaging (SPECT), 90% and 91.6%. The results of bull's eye imaging and SPECT interpreted together were 96.6% and 83.3%. The regional sensitivity and specificity of bull's eye for individual coronary arteries were: right coronary artery (RCA), 100% and 73.7%; left anterior descending (LAD), 100% and 87.2%; left circumflex (LCx), 100% and 97.3%. For SPECT they were: RCA, 93.7% and 89.5%; LAD, 86.6% and 92.3%; LCx, 73.3% and 97.4%. For bull's eye with SPECT they were: RCA, 94.4% and 86.1%; LAD, 87.5% and 92.1%; LCx, 82.3% and 97.2%. We conclude that the bull's eye image display allows an easier and more objective assessment of myocardial perfusion defects and shows higher sensitivity. However, it has a relatively low specificity which can cause an overestimation of perfusion defects. Thus, visual analysis of bull's eye imaging is a useful diagnostic tool but must be evaluated in conjunction with tomographic imaging.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估所谓的“靶心”成像作为断层扫描切片的简化显示在检测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)中的实用性。共有64例患者在负荷和静息状态下接受了单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)检查,使用的示踪剂为铊-201(201Tl)或锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈(Tc-MIBI)。在所有病例中,以冠状动脉造影结果作为金标准,评估单独通过靶心图像以及结合断层图像的视觉分析检测到的心肌灌注缺损。检测CAD的总体敏感性和特异性如下:靶心成像,分别为100%和70.8%;断层成像(SPECT),分别为90%和91.6%。将靶心成像和SPECT的结果综合解读时,敏感性和特异性分别为96.6%和83.3%。靶心成像对各支冠状动脉的局部敏感性和特异性为:右冠状动脉(RCA),分别为100%和73.7%;左前降支(LAD),分别为100%和87.2%;左旋支(LCx),分别为100%和97.3%。SPECT对各支冠状动脉的局部敏感性和特异性为:RCA,分别为93.7%和89.5%;LAD,分别为86.6%和92.3%;LCx,分别为73.3%和97.4%。靶心成像与SPECT联合时对各支冠状动脉的局部敏感性和特异性为:RCA,分别为94.4%和86.1%;LAD,分别为87.5%和92.1%;LCx,分别为82.3%和97.2%。我们得出结论,靶心图像显示能够更轻松、更客观地评估心肌灌注缺损,且敏感性更高。然而,其特异性相对较低,可能导致对灌注缺损的高估。因此,靶心成像的视觉分析是一种有用的诊断工具,但必须结合断层成像进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验