Pitts R C, Lewis M J, Dworkin S I
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27103.
Life Sci. 1993;52(1):PL1-6. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90294-d.
Lever pressing by pairs of rats was maintained under random-ratio (first subject) and yoked-interval (second subject) schedules of food presentation. The inter-reinforcement intervals generated under the ratio schedule comprised the interval values for the second (yoked) subject. This arrangement yielded nearly equivalent rates of food presentation for each subject pair. For the first rat of each pair a random-ratio schedule of shock presentation was added to the ratio schedule of food presentation. This manipulation resulted in similar rates of punished (first rat) and nonpunished (second rat) responding within subject pairs. Ethanol administration (0.25-1.5 g/kg) generally resulted in dose-related decreases in both punished and nonpunished responding. In general, punishment-specific effects were not obtained. These results suggest that ethanol may not be as effective as chlordiazepoxide or pentobarbital in increasing punished responding even when the effects of baseline response and reinforcement rates are controlled.
成对大鼠的杠杆按压行为在食物呈现的随机比率(第一只大鼠)和匹配间隔(第二只大鼠)时间表下得以维持。比率时间表下产生的强化间隔构成了第二只(匹配)大鼠的间隔值。这种安排使得每对大鼠的食物呈现率几乎相等。对于每对中的第一只大鼠,在食物呈现的比率时间表上增加了电击呈现的随机比率时间表。这种操作导致每对大鼠中受惩罚(第一只大鼠)和未受惩罚(第二只大鼠)反应的速率相似。给予乙醇(0.25 - 1.5克/千克)通常会导致受惩罚和未受惩罚反应均出现与剂量相关的减少。一般来说,未获得特定于惩罚的效应。这些结果表明,即使在控制了基线反应和强化率的影响时,乙醇在增加受惩罚反应方面可能不如氯氮卓或戊巴比妥有效。