Suppr超能文献

评论:平衡生死——谨慎前行。

Commentary: balancing life and death--proceed with caution.

作者信息

Dubler N N

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1993 Jan;83(1):23-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.23.

Abstract

Hospital professionals' decisions to permit death are amalgams of medical, ethical, and legal judgments. Medical education and socialization and the business of health all focus on offering and providing treatment, not on facilitating death. Some patients are suspicious that rights to refuse care will foster abandonment by care providers. Lawyers and risk managers often let exaggerated fears of future liability limit patients' and families' rights. The culture of medical institutions must change to accommodate notions of negotiated death.

摘要

医院专业人员做出允许死亡的决定,是医学、伦理和法律判断的综合结果。医学教育、社会化过程以及医疗行业都专注于提供治疗,而非促成死亡。一些患者怀疑拒绝治疗的权利会导致医护人员放弃他们。律师和风险管理人员常常因对未来责任的过度担忧而限制患者及其家属的权利。医疗机构的文化必须改变,以适应协商死亡的观念。

相似文献

1
3
Living wills and the right to die with dignity.
Melb Univ Law Rev. 1991 Dec;18(2):329-49.
7
Cruzan: it's not over, Nancy?
J Clin Ethics. 1990 Fall;1(3):237-41.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验