Brooks D C, Bouton M E
Department of Psychology, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1993 Jan;19(1):77-89. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.19.1.77.
Four experiments with rats in an appetitive conditioned magazine entry preparation examined spontaneous recovery after extinction. Spontaneous recovery was obtained 6 days but not 5 hr following extinction; recovery depended on the passage of time but not on the removal of a cue that was featured in extinction or on the reintroduction of early-session cues. A cue featured in extinction attenuated recovery when presented on the test. The attenuation effect depended on the cue's correlation with extinction; a cue featured in conditioning did not attenuate recovery. The extinction cue did not evoke responding on its own, suggesting that it was not a conditioned excitor. Retardation tests and a summation test did not reveal that it was a conditioned inhibitor. The cue might work by retrieving a memory of extinction. Spontaneous recovery thus occurs because the subject fails to retrieve an extinction memory. Other accounts of spontaneous recovery are discussed.
在一项以大鼠为对象的食欲性条件化食盒进入准备实验中,进行了四项实验来研究消退后的自发恢复现象。在消退后6天出现了自发恢复,但5小时后未出现;恢复取决于时间的推移,而不取决于消除消退过程中出现的线索或重新引入早期阶段的线索。在测试时呈现消退过程中出现的线索会减弱恢复。这种减弱效应取决于该线索与消退的相关性;在条件化过程中出现的线索不会减弱恢复。消退线索本身不会引发反应,这表明它不是一个条件性兴奋物。延迟测试和总和测试并未表明它是一个条件性抑制物。该线索可能是通过唤起消退记忆来起作用的。因此,自发恢复的发生是因为主体未能检索到消退记忆。还讨论了关于自发恢复的其他解释。