• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗事故索赔与剖宫产之间的关系。

Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.

作者信息

Localio A R, Lawthers A G, Bengtson J M, Hebert L E, Weaver S L, Brennan T A, Landis J R

机构信息

Center for Biostatics and Epidemiology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033.

出版信息

JAMA. 1993 Jan 20;269(3):366-73.

PMID:8418343
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether an association exists between the probability of a cesarean delivery and the level of malpractice claims risk faced by hospitals and physicians.

DESIGN

Survey of computerized discharge data linked with physician and hospital malpractice claims records based on stratified, random sample of hospitals.

SETTING

Acute care hospitals in New York State in 1984.

POPULATION

All deliveries (60 490) at 31 hospitals.

RESULTS

After controlling for the clinical risk of a cesarean delivery, patient socioeconomic status, and physician and hospital characteristics, cesarean delivery was positively associated with physician malpractice premiums (odds ratio [OR], 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13 to 4.24 for the difference between upstate and New York City levels), with the number of physician claims opened per 100 physicians at the hospital level (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.30 for a 1-SD change), and with the number of hospital claims opened per 1000 discharges (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.43 for a 1-SD change). Measures of physician-perceived risk of suit also showed a significant association with cesarean delivery (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.53 to 2.52, upstate vs New York City). Within hospitals, there was no significant association (OR, 1.15; P = .126) between the odds of cesarean delivery and the claims history (none vs one or more) of an individual physician.

CONCLUSION

Results support previous speculations of a positive association between malpractice claims risk and the rate of cesarean delivery.

摘要

目的

调查剖宫产概率与医院及医生面临的医疗事故索赔风险水平之间是否存在关联。

设计

基于医院分层随机样本,对与医生和医院医疗事故索赔记录相关联的计算机化出院数据进行调查。

地点

1984年纽约州的急症医院。

研究对象

31所医院的所有分娩病例(60490例)。

结果

在控制了剖宫产的临床风险、患者社会经济状况以及医生和医院特征后,剖宫产与医生医疗事故保险费呈正相关(比值比[OR]为3.00;95%置信区间[CI],纽约州北部与纽约市水平差异为2.13至4.24),与医院层面每100名医生开启的医生索赔数量呈正相关(OR为1.15;95%CI,标准差变化1时为1.02至1.30),与每1000例出院开启的医院索赔数量呈正相关(OR为1.26;95%CI,标准差变化1时为1.10至1.43)。医生感知的诉讼风险指标也显示与剖宫产有显著关联(OR为1.96;95%CI,纽约州北部与纽约市相比为1.53至2.52)。在医院内部,剖宫产几率与个体医生的索赔历史(无索赔与有一项或多项索赔)之间无显著关联(OR为1.15;P = 0.126)。

结论

结果支持了先前关于医疗事故索赔风险与剖宫产率之间存在正相关的推测。

相似文献

1
Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.医疗事故索赔与剖宫产之间的关系。
JAMA. 1993 Jan 20;269(3):366-73.
2
Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.社会经济因素与剖宫产术后阴道分娩的几率
JAMA. 1994 Aug 17;272(7):524-9.
3
Malpractice experience and the incidence of cesarean delivery: a physician-level longitudinal analysis.医疗事故经历与剖宫产发生率:一项医生层面的纵向分析。
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):170-88. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.170.
4
Defensive medicine and obstetrics.防御性医疗与产科学
JAMA. 1995;274(20):1606-10.
5
Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois.纽约州和伊利诺伊州的医疗事故保险费及剖宫产率
Public Health Rep. 1988 Sep-Oct;103(5):459-63.
6
The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States.美国剖宫产率变化与区域医疗保健使用的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):735.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.023. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
7
Hospital-Level Factors Associated with Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events in Cesarean Deliveries, New York State, 2009-2011.2009 - 2011年纽约州剖宫产术中与麻醉相关不良事件相关的医院层面因素
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jun;122(6):1947-56. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001341.
8
Medical Malpractice Liability Exposure and OB/GYN Physician Delivery Decisions.医疗事故责任风险与妇产科医生的分娩决策
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2633-2650. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12813. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
9
The cesarean decision in New York State, 1986. Economic and noneconomic aspects.
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):529-40. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00006.
10
Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.台北市立医院剖宫产率院际比较的风险调整
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Aug;127(2):190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.016. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Does patient behaviour drive physicians to practice defensive medicine? Evidence from a video experiment.患者行为是否会促使医生采取防御性医疗行为?来自一项视频实验的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2023 Sep 22;13(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00458-3.
2
"An unnecessary cut?" multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in Italy: a systematic review.“不必要的剖宫产?”意大利剖宫产率驱动因素的多层次卫生系统分析:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03462-1.
3
Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.
美国未参保女性的剖宫产:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356.
4
Interventions targeted at health professionals to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.针对卫生专业人员的干预措施以减少不必要的剖宫产:定性证据综合评价。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 16;8(12):e025073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025073.
5
Association of Medical Liability Reform With Clinician Approach to Coronary Artery Disease Management.医疗责任改革与临床医生冠心病管理方法的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):609-618. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1360.
6
The attitudes towards defensive medicine among physicians of obstetrics and gynaecology in China: a questionnaire survey in a national congress.中国妇产科医生对防御性医疗的态度:一项在全国性会议上的问卷调查
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 3;8(2):e019752. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019752.
7
The Ethics of Teaching Physicians Electronic Fetal Monitoring: And Now for the Rest of the Story.教医生电子胎儿监护的伦理学:现在讲讲后续情况。
Surg J (N Y). 2017 Mar 20;3(1):e42-e47. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599229. eCollection 2017 Jan.
8
Do tort reforms impact the incidence of birth by cesarean section? A reassessment.侵权法改革会影响剖宫产的发生率吗?重新评估。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2017 Mar;17(1):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s10754-016-9202-8. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
9
Factors associated with cesarean delivery rates: a single-institution experience.剖宫产率相关因素:单机构经验
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017 Apr 21;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s40748-017-0047-z. eCollection 2017.
10
Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study.医生支出与医疗事故索赔的后续风险:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2015 Nov 4;351:h5516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5516.