Von Wichert P, Joseph K, Müller B, Franck W M
Department of Internal Medicine, Medizinische Poliklinik, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Jan;147(1):148-52. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.1.148.
A precise calculation of the amount of intraalveolar fluid is the basis of a quantitative analysis of intraalveolar compounds. Different approaches have been made to cover this important problem. Here, we report a comparative study with five markers: 99mTc-DTPA, 51Cr-EDTA, inulin, urea, and methylene blue in animal experiments as well as in human experiments. The marker substances were added to the lavage fluid, and the "dilution" of the markers, i.e., the alveolar fluid, was calculated. The results showed that in animals with healthy lungs the tracer methods are able to calculate amounts of intraalveolar fluid that are comparable to morphologic findings. In animals as well as in humans, methylene blue and inulin were shown to be useless in determining alveolar fluid volume compared with the tracer methods. In humans, the calculations with the urea method and with Tc-DTPA were in the same magnitude, but there was no individual correlation. We conclude that, at present, the methods to quantitate alveolar fluid volume lack precision and add nothing to a deeper understanding of alveolar biology.
精确计算肺泡内液体量是对肺泡内化合物进行定量分析的基础。人们已经采用了不同方法来解决这一重要问题。在此,我们报告一项在动物实验和人体实验中使用99mTc - DTPA、51Cr - EDTA、菊粉、尿素和亚甲蓝这五种标志物的对比研究。将标志物物质添加到灌洗液中,并计算标志物的“稀释度”,即肺泡液量。结果表明,在肺部健康的动物中,示踪方法能够计算出与形态学结果相当的肺泡内液体量。与示踪方法相比,在动物和人体中均显示亚甲蓝和菊粉在确定肺泡液体积方面毫无用处。在人体中,用尿素法和用Tc - DTPA法计算的结果处于同一数量级,但不存在个体相关性。我们得出结论,目前,定量肺泡液体积的方法缺乏精确性,对于深入理解肺泡生物学并无助益。