Haas C F, Weg J G, Kettell C W, Caldwell E J, Zaccardelli D S, Brown D L
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0024.
Crit Care Med. 1993 Jan;21(1):125-30. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199301000-00023.
To evaluate a supplemental heated filter system during mechanical ventilation with continuous nebulization of an artificial surfactant by a new, high-volume nebulizer.
A new nebulizer system, containing artificial surfactant, provided half of a 20-L minute ventilation and the remainder of this minute ventilation was provided by a commonly used mechanical ventilator. Ventilation sources were joined in the inspiratory limb of the breathing circuit, which was connected to a test lung system. A supplemental filter system was placed upstream of the ventilator's heated filter in the expiratory limb of the circuit. Circuit pressures at the inlet of the supplemental filter (P1), between the filters (P2), and after the ventilator expiratory filter (P3) were monitored and recorded. Nebulizer canisters containing artificial surfactant were replaced every 4 hrs. The performance of four supplemental filters in continuous use was examined. Another four filters were each used over 4 hrs, steam autoclaved, and reused.
The ventilator was set at a rate of 20 breaths/min, with a tidal volume of 0.5 L, a flow rate of 40 L/min, and positive end-expiratory pressure of 10 cm H2O. The nebulizer provided an equal volume and flow rate so that the delivered tidal volume was 1.0 L with a flow rate of 80 L/min.
Ventilator failure and/or excessive airway pressure caused by increased filter resistance occurred at a mean of 7.3 +/- 1.3 (SD) hrs of continuous ventilation. Mean P1-peak increased from 67.5 +/- 8.2 to 94.0 +/- 10.7 cm H2O (p < .001) and P1-baseline increased from 9.3 +/- 1.0 to 53.5 +/- 17.1 cm H2O (p = .014). Filters that were autoclaved after 4 hrs of ventilation and reused lasted a total of 7.0 +/- 1.3 hrs. Mean P1-peak increased from 68.9 +/- 4.9 to 84.8 +/- 19.1 cm H2O and P1-baseline increased from 9.5 +/- 1.7 to 30.8 +/- 14.2 cm H2O (p < .05).
The supplemental filter system was able to protect the ventilatory exhalation sensors for approximately 7 hrs at a minute ventilation of 20 L/min. Steam sterilization did not extend the supplemental filter life.
通过一种新型大容量雾化器,在机械通气并持续雾化人工表面活性剂的过程中评估一种辅助加热过滤系统。
一种新型雾化器系统,包含人工表面活性剂,提供20升/分钟通气量的一半,该分钟通气量的其余部分由常用的机械通气机提供。通气源在呼吸回路的吸气支路上连接在一起,呼吸回路连接到一个测试肺系统。在回路呼气支路上,一个辅助过滤系统放置在通气机加热过滤器的上游。监测并记录辅助过滤器入口处(P1)、两个过滤器之间(P2)以及通气机呼气过滤器之后(P3)的回路压力。每4小时更换一次装有人工表面活性剂的雾化器药罐。检查了连续使用的四个辅助过滤器的性能。另外四个过滤器每个使用4小时后进行蒸汽高压灭菌并重复使用。
通气机设置为呼吸频率20次/分钟,潮气量0.5升,流速40升/分钟,呼气末正压10厘米水柱。雾化器提供相同的体积和流速,使得输送的潮气量为1.0升,流速为80升/分钟。
在连续通气平均7.3±1.3(标准差)小时时,由于过滤器阻力增加导致通气机故障和/或气道压力过高。平均P1峰值从67.5±8.2厘米水柱增加到94.0±10.7厘米水柱(p<.001),P1基线从9.3±1.0厘米水柱增加到53.5±17.1厘米水柱(p = .014)。通气4小时后进行高压灭菌并重复使用的过滤器总共持续了7.0±1.3小时。平均P1峰值从68.9±4.9厘米水柱增加到84.8±19.1厘米水柱,P1基线从9.5±1.7厘米水柱增加到30.8±14.2厘米水柱(p<.05)。
辅助过滤系统在20升/分钟的分钟通气量下能够保护通气呼气传感器约7小时。蒸汽灭菌并未延长辅助过滤器的使用寿命。