1 Department of Respiratory Care, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
2 Department of Respiratory Care, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2019 Feb;32(1):34-39. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2018.1457. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) maintains a sustained airway pressure over a large proportion of the respiratory cycle, and has a long inspiratory time at high pressure. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the APRV with and without spontaneous breathing on albuterol aerosol delivery with a continuous vibrating-mesh nebulizer (VMN) placed at different positions on an adult lung model of invasive mechanical ventilation.
An adult lung model was assembled by connecting a ventilator with a dual-limb circuit to an 8-mm inner diameter endotracheal tube (ETT) and collecting filter attached to a test lung with set compliance of 0.1 L/cmHO and resistance of 0.5 cmHO/(L·s). Four ventilator modes were compared: pressure control ventilation (PCV) with no bias flow, PCV with bias flow of 6 L/min (PCV), APRV with no spontaneous breaths (APRV), and APRV with spontaneous breath trigger (APRVs). Peak inspiratory pressure, peak end-expiratory pressure, aerosol dose, and nebulization time were similar for all modes. The VMN was placed (1) between Y-piece and inspiratory limb, (2) at the gas outlet of a heated humidifier, and (3) at the gas inlet of a heated humidifier. Albuterol sulfate (5 mg/2.5 mL) was administered with each run and collected on a filter distal to the ETT. Deposited drug was eluted from each filter (purified water) and analyzed by UV spectrophotometry at 276 nm. Analysis of variance [general linear model (GLM) multivariate] was performed using the linear model of multiple variables, significance at p < 0.05.
Albuterol (in micrograms, mean ± standard deviation) delivered was higher with VMN placed at the gas inlet of the humidifier with each mode of ventilation (p < 0.01). APRVs has the highest albuterol delivery followed by PCV, PCV, and APRV (1706.2 ± 60.9 μg vs. 1490.6 ± 61.1 μg vs. 1182.3 ± 61.4 μg vs. 1153.1 ± 99.7 μg, respectively, p < 0.001). The minute volume was positively correlated with the inhaled albuterol dose.
Spontaneous breathing increased the albuterol delivery during APRV, compared with APRV alone and PCV modes. Placing the nebulizer proximal to the ventilator was more efficient for all modes tested.
气道压力释放通气 (APRV) 在呼吸周期的大部分时间内保持持续的气道压力,并具有高压下的长吸气时间。本研究旨在确定 APRV 在有无自主呼吸的情况下对带有连续振动网雾化器 (VMN) 的成人机械通气肺模型中沙丁胺醇气溶胶输送的影响,该 VMN 放置在不同位置。
通过将带有双肢回路的呼吸机连接到内径为 8 毫米的气管内导管 (ETT) 和连接到具有设定顺应性为 0.1 L/cmHO 和阻力为 0.5 cmHO/(L·s) 的测试肺的收集过滤器,组装成人肺模型。比较了四种呼吸机模式:无偏流的压力控制通气 (PCV)、具有 6 L/min 偏流的 PCV (PCV)、无自主呼吸的 APRV (APRV) 和具有自主呼吸触发的 APRV (APRVs)。所有模式的峰吸气压、峰呼气末压、气溶胶剂量和雾化时间相似。VMN 放置在 (1) Y 型件和吸气肢之间,(2) 加热加湿器的出气口,和 (3) 加热加湿器的进气口。每次运行时给予硫酸沙丁胺醇 (5mg/2.5mL),并在 ETT 远端的过滤器上收集。从每个过滤器 (纯化水) 洗脱沉积的药物,并在 276nm 处通过紫外分光光度法分析。使用多变量线性模型进行方差分析[通用线性模型 (GLM) 多变量],显著性水平为 p<0.05。
在每种通气模式下,VMN 放置在加湿器的进气口时,沙丁胺醇输送量更高 (p<0.01)。APRVs 的沙丁胺醇输送量最高,其次是 PCV、PCV 和 APRV (分别为 1706.2±60.9μg、1490.6±61.1μg、1182.3±61.4μg 和 1153.1±99.7μg,p<0.001)。分钟通气量与吸入的沙丁胺醇剂量呈正相关。
与 APRV 单独和 PCV 模式相比,自主呼吸增加了 APRV 期间的沙丁胺醇输送量。在所有测试模式中,将雾化器放置在靠近呼吸机的位置效率更高。