• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1990年北美产钳分娩情况调查。

Survey of forceps delivery in North America in 1990.

作者信息

Ramin S M, Little B B, Gilstrap L C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;81(2):307-11.

PMID:8423970
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether opinions and practice patterns have markedly changed over the past decade and whether clinicians are cognizant of the new ACOG definitions for forceps deliveries.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-five United States and Canadian residency programs were surveyed via a questionnaire; 203 (69%) responded. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi 2 test, Yates correction factor, and the extended Mantel-Haenszel test.

RESULTS

All but two program directors (99%) were familiar with the new definitions, which were being used by 162 (80%) of the programs. All institutions used outlet and low forceps, although 14% no longer performed midforceps deliveries. Attending faculty were the primary instructors in 67% of United States and 100% of Canadian programs. Simpson forceps were the most commonly used for outlet (46%) and low (43%) forceps deliveries. Kielland (27%) and Simpson (24%) instruments were most commonly used for midforceps deliveries.

CONCLUSION

Although the rate of midforceps use decreased, operative vaginal delivery was still commonly taught in residency programs in North America in 1990.

摘要

目的

确定在过去十年中观点和实践模式是否发生了显著变化,以及临床医生是否知晓美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)关于产钳助产的新定义。

方法

通过问卷调查对295个美国和加拿大的住院医师培训项目进行了调查;203个项目(69%)做出了回应。使用卡方检验、耶茨校正因子和扩展的曼特尔 - 亨塞尔检验进行统计分析。

结果

除两名项目主任外(99%),所有项目主任都熟悉新定义,其中162个项目(80%)正在使用这些定义。所有机构都使用出口产钳和低位产钳,尽管14%的机构不再进行中位产钳助产。在美国67%的项目和加拿大100%的项目中,主治教员是主要授课教师。辛普森产钳是出口产钳助产(46%)和低位产钳助产(43%)中最常用的。基兰德产钳(27%)和辛普森产钳(24%)是中位产钳助产中最常用的器械。

结论

尽管中位产钳的使用比例有所下降,但1990年北美住院医师培训项目中仍普遍教授手术阴道分娩。

相似文献

1
Survey of forceps delivery in North America in 1990.1990年北美产钳分娩情况调查。
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;81(2):307-11.
2
Forceps and vacuum delivery: expectations of residency and fellowship training program directors.产钳与真空助产:住院医师及专科培训项目主任的期望
Am J Perinatol. 1999;16(1):23-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993831.
3
Survey of obstetric forceps training in North America in 1981.1981年北美产科产钳培训调查。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jan 1;151(1):54-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90423-5.
4
Forceps and vacuum delivery: a survey of North American residency programs.产钳和真空助产:北美住院医师培训项目调查
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):622-5. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00208-6.
5
Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency.住院医师培训中的真空吸引和产钳操作训练:经验与自我报告的能力
J Perinatol. 2007 Jun;27(6):343-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211734. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
6
[Obstetrical forceps: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Toward a new classification of obstetrical forceps].[产科产钳:过去、现在与未来。迈向产科产钳的新分类法]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005 Dec;33(12):980-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.06.024.
7
Does the number of forceps deliveries performed in residency predict use in practice?住院医师培训期间产钳分娩的数量能否预测其在实际临床中的使用情况?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):93.e1-93.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
8
Teaching forceps: the impact of proactive faculty.教学夹:主动型教员的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;204(5):448.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.056. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
9
Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?对失败的恐惧:我们在产房进行的器械助产操作是否过多?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1234-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802443848.
10
Resident and program director confidence in resident preparedness for operative vaginal deliveries in Obstetrics and Gynecology Training Programs in the United States.美国妇产科培训项目中住院医师及项目主任对住院医师进行阴道助产准备情况的信心
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jan;4(1):100505. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100505. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Instrumental rotation for persistent fetal occiput posterior position: a way to decrease maternal and neonatal injury?持续性枕后位的器械旋转:一种减少母婴损伤的方法?
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 18;8(10):e78124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078124. eCollection 2013.