• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[A cost-efficacy analysis of treatment with antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies in gram-negative sepsis].

作者信息

Badía X, Segú L, García Alonso F, Rovira J

机构信息

SOIKOS, Centro de Estudios en Economía de la Salud y Política Social, S.L. Barcelona.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1993 Jan 23;100(3):84-9.

PMID:8426499
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the cost-efficacy analysis of treatment with antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies in adult patients admitted to intensive care units for completing the decision making regulating the authorization of registry of drugs in Spain.

METHODS

Two treatment strategies were considered: to treat with antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies, addition to conventional treatment, to all patients with sepsis or to all those with septic shock versus the alternative of only carrying out conventional treatment. The economic evaluation technique which quantifies costs in pesetas and efficacy in years of life gained by the treatment alternatives was considered.

RESULTS

The cost per year of additional life gained from treatment to all patients with sepsis was higher (859, 288 pesetas per year of life gained) than that in patients treated for septic shock (293, 810 pesetas per year of life gained). The result was very sensitive to changes in those expected in survival of the patients treated.

CONCLUSIONS

In agreement with this cost efficacy analysis the hypothesis to authorize drug registry in Spain for the indication of septic shock is reinforced. The results may vary upon the obtaining of more clinical and epidemiologic information of the treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
[A cost-efficacy analysis of treatment with antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies in gram-negative sepsis].
Med Clin (Barc). 1993 Jan 23;100(3):84-9.
2
[A cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment with antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies in gram-negative sepsis].
Med Clin (Barc). 1993 Dec 4;101(19):757-8.
3
Cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies to gram-negative endotoxin in the treatment of gram-negative sepsis in ICU patients.单克隆抗体治疗重症监护病房革兰阴性菌败血症患者革兰阴性内毒素的成本效益分析
JAMA. 1993 Jan 13;269(2):249-54.
4
Gram-negative sepsis, the sepsis syndrome, and the role of antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies.革兰氏阴性菌败血症、败血症综合征及抗内毒素单克隆抗体的作用
Clin Pharm. 1992 Mar;11(3):223-35.
5
Antibody to endotoxin in the treatment of gram-negative sepsis.抗内毒素抗体治疗革兰阴性菌败血症。
JAMA. 1992 May 6;267(17):2325; author reply 2326. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.17.2325c.
6
Antibody to endotoxin in the treatment of gram-negative sepsis.内毒素抗体治疗革兰氏阴性菌败血症。
JAMA. 1992 May 6;267(17):2325-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03480170051016.
7
Observations using antiendotoxin antibody (E5) as adjuvant therapy in humans with suspected, serious, gram-negative sepsis.使用抗内毒素抗体(E5)作为辅助治疗手段,对疑似患有严重革兰氏阴性菌败血症的患者进行观察。
Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):730-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00005.
8
A controlled clinical trial of E5 murine monoclonal IgM antibody to endotoxin in the treatment of gram-negative sepsis. The XOMA Sepsis Study Group.E5鼠抗内毒素单克隆IgM抗体治疗革兰氏阴性败血症的对照临床试验。XOMA败血症研究小组。
JAMA. 1991 Aug 28;266(8):1097-102.
9
Antibody to endotoxin in the treatment of gram-negative sepsis.抗内毒素抗体治疗革兰氏阴性菌败血症。
JAMA. 1992 May 6;267(17):2326-7.
10
Cost-effectiveness of HA-1A monoclonal antibody for gram-negative sepsis. Economic assessment of a new therapeutic agent.HA - 1A单克隆抗体治疗革兰氏阴性菌败血症的成本效益。一种新型治疗药物的经济学评估。
JAMA. 1991 Dec 25;266(24):3466-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Health economic evaluations of sepsis interventions in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review.危重症成年患者脓毒症干预措施的卫生经济学评价:一项系统综述
J Intensive Care. 2020 Jan 8;8:5. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0412-2. eCollection 2020.
2
The use of cost per life year gained as a measurement of cost-effectiveness in Spain: a systematic review of recent publications.使用获得的每生命年成本作为西班牙成本效益的衡量标准:对近期出版物的系统回顾。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;13(6):723-40. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0326-y. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
3
Economic assessment of drugs in Spain.
西班牙药品的经济评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Feb;5(2):123-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199405020-00006.