Gotoh O, Tamura A, Oka H, Tsujita Y, Sano K, Yasui N, Suzuki A, Hadeishi H, Nihei H, Manaka S
Department of Neurosurgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine.
No Shinkei Geka. 1993 Jan;21(1):37-43.
A series of 610 patients who had aneurysm surgery within 7 days of the hemorrhage were analyzed as to the relationship between the preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and the outcome assessed by using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months after surgery. The patient distribution in accordance with the GCS scores in descending order from 15 to 3 was as follows: 265, 109, 44, 24, 17, 20, 25, 15, 18, 12, 16, 23, and 22 cases, respectively. In general, the larger the GCS score, the better the outcome. Thus, the overall results proved to be significantly correlated with the GCS score prior to surgery (r = 0.608, P < 0.01). As for demarcation levels along the GCS axis in terms of the GOS, a significant difference in the outcome was observed at the level of GCS scores between 15 and 14 (P < 0.0001, Wilcoxon test). However, no borderlines were evident at any GCS levels other than 15/14. The problems of applying the GCS to the grading system of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage are discussed.
对610例在出血后7天内接受动脉瘤手术的患者进行了分析,以探讨术前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分与术后6个月使用格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评估的结果之间的关系。根据GCS评分从15到3降序排列的患者分布如下:分别为265例、109例、44例、24例、17例、20例、25例、15例、18例、12例、16例、23例和22例。一般来说,GCS评分越高,结果越好。因此,总体结果被证明与术前GCS评分显著相关(r = 0.608,P < 0.01)。就GOS而言,沿GCS轴的分界水平方面,在GCS评分15和14之间观察到结果有显著差异(P < 0.0001,Wilcoxon检验)。然而,除了15/14之外,在任何GCS水平都没有明显的界限。文中讨论了将GCS应用于动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血分级系统的问题。