• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

除皱术中的伤口张力。皮瓣下潜行分离和表浅肌肉腱膜系统悬吊的效果。

Wound tension in rhytidectomy. Effects of skin-flap undermining and superficial musculoaponeurotic system suspension.

作者信息

Burgess L P, Casler J D, Kryzer T C

机构信息

Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Feb;119(2):173-6; discussion 176-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880140055010.

DOI:10.1001/archotol.1993.01880140055010
PMID:8427680
Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of skin-flap undermining and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) suspension on wound-closing tension. Nine sides from five fresh-frozen cadavers were used, with closing tension measured at the two main anchor points, anteriorly (A) and posteriorly (P), with and without SMAS plication for minimal (MIN), intermediate (INT), and maximal (MAX) skin-flap undermining. Results indicated that closing tension was significantly decreased with SMAS plication, both A and P, for all three levels of skin undermining. The average decrease in closing tension with SMAS plication was: A-MIN 191 g, A-INT 95 g, A-MAX 83 g, P-MIN 235 g, P-INT 68 g, and P-MAX 70 g (P < .001 for all). Considering the effect of skin-flap undermining alone, closing tension decreased with wider skin-flap undermining, both with and without SMAS plication. The tension-reducing effect of SMAS plication was decreased with wider skin-flap undermining. Regression analysis determined a second-order exponential curve relating closing tension to skin excision.

摘要

本研究旨在确定皮瓣潜行分离和浅表肌肉腱膜系统(SMAS)悬吊对伤口闭合张力的影响。使用了来自5具新鲜冷冻尸体的9个侧面,在有和没有SMAS折叠的情况下,于两个主要锚定点(前方(A)和后方(P))测量最小(MIN)、中度(INT)和最大(MAX)皮瓣潜行分离时的闭合张力。结果表明,对于所有三个皮瓣潜行分离水平,SMAS折叠均显著降低了A和P处的闭合张力。SMAS折叠导致的闭合张力平均降低幅度为:A-MIN 191 g,A-INT 95 g,A-MAX 83 g,P-MIN 235 g,P-INT 68 g,P-MAX 70 g(所有P值均<0.001)。仅考虑皮瓣潜行分离的影响,无论有无SMAS折叠,闭合张力均随皮瓣潜行分离范围扩大而降低。随着皮瓣潜行分离范围扩大,SMAS折叠的张力降低效果减弱。回归分析确定了一条将闭合张力与皮肤切除相关联的二阶指数曲线。

相似文献

1
Wound tension in rhytidectomy. Effects of skin-flap undermining and superficial musculoaponeurotic system suspension.除皱术中的伤口张力。皮瓣下潜行分离和表浅肌肉腱膜系统悬吊的效果。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Feb;119(2):173-6; discussion 176-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880140055010.
2
Wound tension in rhytidectomy. A preliminary report.除皱术中的伤口张力。初步报告。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Nov;114(11):1280-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1988.01860230074028.
3
Biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of skin, SMAS, and composite flaps as they pertain to rhytidectomy.皮肤、SMAS及复合皮瓣与除皱术相关的生物力学和粘弹性特性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Aug;110(2):590-8; discussion 599-600. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00035.
4
Anatomical comparison of platysmal tightening using superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication vs deep-plane rhytidectomy techniques.使用表浅肌肉腱膜系统折叠术与深层平面除皱术进行颈阔肌收紧的解剖学比较。
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011 Nov-Dec;13(6):395-7. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2011.69.
5
Biplanar superficial musculoaponeurotic system imbrication rhytidectomy.双平面表浅肌肉腱膜系统重叠除皱术
Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Aug;30(4):380-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383556. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
6
Avoiding early revision rhytidectomy: a biomechanical comparison of tissue plication suture techniques.避免早期修复性除皱术:组织折叠缝合技术的生物力学比较
Laryngoscope. 2008 Dec;118(12):2107-10. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181856067.
7
The contribution of the SMAS to the blood supply in the lateral face lift flap.在侧面提升皮瓣中,SMAS对血供的贡献。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Sep;100(4):1011-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199709001-00027.
8
A Comparison Between Two Methods of Face-Lift Surgery in Nine Cadavers: SMAS (Superficial Musculo-Aponeurotic System) Versus MACS (Minimal Access Cranial Suspension).九具尸体的两种面部提升手术方法比较:SMAS(表浅肌肉腱膜系统)与MACS(微创颅骨悬吊术)
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;39(5):680-5. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0543-3. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
9
The biomechanical effects of deep tissue support as related to brow and facelift procedures.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Sep;88(3):427-32. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199109000-00008.
10
Is the SMAS Flap Facelift Safe? A Comparison of Complications Between the Sub-SMAS Approach Versus the Subcutaneous Approach With or Without SMAS Plication in Aesthetic Rhytidectomy at an Academic Institution.SMAS皮瓣面部提升术安全吗?学术机构中美学除皱术中皮下SMAS入路与皮下入路(有无SMAS折叠)并发症的比较。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Dec;39(6):870-6. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0558-9. Epub 2015 Aug 27.