Suppr超能文献

痴呆症的诊断:单一学科方法与多学科方法的比较

Diagnosing dementia: a comparison between a monodisciplinary and a multidisciplinary approach.

作者信息

Verhey F R, Jolles J, Ponds R W, Rozendaal N, Plugge L A, de Vet R C, Vreeling F W, van der Lugt P J

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychology/Psychobiology, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993 Winter;5(1):78-85. doi: 10.1176/jnp.5.1.78.

Abstract

Discrepancies were examined in diagnostic outcome between a monodisciplinary approach and a multidisciplinary, criteria-based approach in patients referred to a university memory clinic. Of 278 patients not fulfilling dementia criteria, 19 had been previously diagnosed as demented (specificity: 0.93). In 60 of 152 demented patients, dementia had not been diagnosed before (sensitivity: 0.61). Underreporting was frequent for mildly demented patients and for patients with coexisting depressive symptoms. In patients referred by psychiatrists, sensitivity rates for dementia and Alzheimer's disease were low; in patients referred by neurologists, depression often went unreported. Results underscore the need for more frequent use of integrated multidisciplinary services for cognitively disturbed patients.

摘要

在转诊至大学记忆诊所的患者中,对单学科方法与基于标准的多学科方法之间的诊断结果差异进行了研究。在278例不符合痴呆标准的患者中,有19例先前被诊断为痴呆(特异性:0.93)。在152例痴呆患者中,有60例之前未被诊断出患有痴呆(敏感性:0.61)。轻度痴呆患者和伴有抑郁症状的患者经常存在漏报情况。在精神科医生转诊的患者中,痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的敏感性率较低;在神经科医生转诊的患者中,抑郁症常常未被报告。结果强调了对认知障碍患者更频繁地使用综合多学科服务的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验