Müller-Thomsen Tomas, Arlt Sönke, Mann Ulrike, Mass Reinhard, Ganzer Stefanie
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 Mar;20(2):271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.03.010.
Depression is a frequent condition in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The prevalence of depressive symptoms depends on the severity of dementia and the instruments used. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of depression dependent on the severity of dementia by four different scales: The 15-point Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Montgomery and Asperg Depression Scale (MADRS), the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) and the Nurses Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER). The study population consisted of 316 patients with Alzheimer's disease from a psychiatric out-patients memory-clinic, which was divided into two groups: mild AD (Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) > or = 18) and moderate to severe AD (MMSE <18). Additionally, internal consistency and correlation of these scales were calculated. Prevalence of depression ranged between 27.5 and 53.4% in mild AD and between 36.3 and 68.4% in moderate to severe AD. Internal consistency was good in all scales (Cronbach's alpha .63-.85). For MADRS and CSDD it was independent of the stage of AD, while in GDS and NOSGER internal consistency decreased with severity of dementia. Correlation between the scales was better in mild AD than moderate to severe AD; the best results were obtained for the correlation between CSDD and MADRS in both groups. We conclude that in our study population CSDD and MADRS were the most consistent tools for detecting depression in AD independently of the severity of dementia.
抑郁症是阿尔茨海默病(AD)中常见的症状。抑郁症状的患病率取决于痴呆的严重程度以及所使用的评估工具。我们的目的是通过四种不同的量表评估依赖于痴呆严重程度的抑郁症患病率:15项老年抑郁量表(GDS)、蒙哥马利 - 阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)、康奈尔痴呆抑郁量表(CSDD)和老年患者护士观察量表(NOSGER)。研究人群包括来自精神科门诊记忆诊所的316例阿尔茨海默病患者,这些患者被分为两组:轻度AD(简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)≥18)和中度至重度AD(MMSE<18)。此外,还计算了这些量表的内部一致性和相关性。轻度AD中抑郁症的患病率在27.5%至53.4%之间,中度至重度AD中在36.3%至68.4%之间。所有量表的内部一致性都很好(克朗巴哈系数α为0.63 - 0.85)。对于MADRS和CSDD,其内部一致性与AD阶段无关,而在GDS和NOSGER中,内部一致性随痴呆严重程度降低。轻度AD中量表之间的相关性优于中度至重度AD;两组中CSDD和MADRS之间的相关性结果最佳。我们得出结论,在我们的研究人群中,CSDD和MADRS是检测AD中抑郁症最一致的工具,与痴呆严重程度无关。