• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在影像学检查过程中使用直肠注射美索比妥对儿童进行镇静。

Rectal methohexital for sedation of children during imaging procedures.

作者信息

Manuli M A, Davies L

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY 14642.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Mar;160(3):577-80. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.3.8430557.

DOI:10.2214/ajr.160.3.8430557
PMID:8430557
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Brevital (methohexital), administered as a solution per rectum, provides safe, rapid, and effective sedation for induction of surgical anesthesia. This study was undertaken to evaluate rectal Brevital as a sedative for children undergoing imaging procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a review of patients' records, we found that, during a 1-year period, 190 children from 1 month to 14 years old were sedated for CT or MR imaging. Sedation was required for 94 CT and 96 MR imaging studies. Rectal Brevital was used in 102 patients (mean age, 25 +/- 2 months), and oral chloral hydrate was used in 88 (mean age, 28 +/- 3 months).

RESULTS

Sleep was achieved in 81% of patients who received Brevital and in 80% of those who received chloral hydrate. Induction time was shorter (p = .0001) with Brevital (9 +/- 1 min) than with chloral hydrate (28 +/- 2 min). The mean duration of sleep was 46 min with Brevital and 66 min with chloral hydrate (p = .0001). Brevital provided adequate sedation in 89 (87%) of 102 imaging studies, and chloral hydrate did so in 73 (83%) of 88 studies. No cardiorespiratory complications or allergic reactions occurred with either drug. Significantly fewer patients were discharged fully awake and alert after sedation with chloral hydrate than with Brevital (p < .002). Children sedated with chloral hydrate also required a longer period of observation in the radiology department (p < .04).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that rectal Brevital produces sedation of adequate duration for most imaging procedures in children. Ease of administration, wide margin of safety, rapid and pleasant induction, and short recovery time make this drug a favorable alternative to other commonly used sedatives.

摘要

目的

以直肠给药溶液形式使用的速眠安(美索比妥)可为诱导外科麻醉提供安全、快速且有效的镇静作用。本研究旨在评估直肠给予速眠安对接受影像检查的儿童的镇静效果。

材料与方法

在回顾患者记录时,我们发现,在1年期间,190名年龄从1个月至14岁的儿童接受了CT或MR成像镇静。94例CT和96例MR成像检查需要镇静。102例患者(平均年龄25±2个月)使用了直肠速眠安,88例患者(平均年龄28±3个月)使用了口服水合氯醛。

结果

接受速眠安的患者中有81%入睡,接受水合氯醛的患者中有80%入睡。速眠安的诱导时间(9±1分钟)比水合氯醛(28±2分钟)短(p = .0001)。速眠安的平均睡眠持续时间为46分钟,水合氯醛为66分钟(p = .0001)。在102例成像检查中,速眠安在89例(87%)中提供了充分镇静,水合氯醛在88例检查中的73例(8

相似文献

1
Rectal methohexital for sedation of children during imaging procedures.在影像学检查过程中使用直肠注射美索比妥对儿童进行镇静。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Mar;160(3):577-80. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.3.8430557.
2
Chloral hydrate sedation of children undergoing CT and MR imaging: safety as judged by American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.水合氯醛对接受CT和MR成像的儿童进行镇静:根据美国儿科学会指南判断安全性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Oct;165(4):905-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.4.7676990.
3
High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age.大剂量水合氯醛镇静用于接受磁共振成像检查的儿童:与年龄相关的安全性和有效性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Sep;161(3):639-41. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352124.
4
Sedation in children undergoing CT scan or MRI: effect of time-course and tolerance of rectal chloral hydrate.接受CT扫描或MRI检查的儿童的镇静:直肠水合氯醛的时间进程和耐受性的影响。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;18(3):347-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00232.x.
5
A comparison of oral chloral hydrate and sublingual midazolam sedation for echocardiogram in children.口服水合氯醛与舌下含服咪达唑仑用于儿童超声心动图镇静的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Oct;91 Suppl 3:S45-52.
6
Sedation of difficult-to-sedate children undergoing MR imaging: value of thioridazine as an adjunct to chloral hydrate.对接受磁共振成像检查的难以镇静的儿童进行镇静处理:硫利达嗪作为水合氯醛辅助药物的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jul;163(1):165-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.1.8010205.
7
Comparison of oral pentobarbital sodium (nembutal) and oral chloral hydrate for sedation of infants during radiologic imaging: preliminary results.口服戊巴比妥钠(速可眠)与水合氯醛用于婴儿放射成像镇静的比较:初步结果
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Apr;180(4):1125-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.4.1801125.
8
Superiority of pentobarbital versus chloral hydrate for sedation in infants during imaging.戊巴比妥与水合氯醛在婴儿影像学检查中镇静效果的比较:戊巴比妥的优势
Radiology. 2004 Feb;230(2):537-42. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2302030107. Epub 2003 Dec 29.
9
Is administration of enteric contrast material safe before abdominal CT in children who require sedation? Experience with chloral hydrate and pentobarbital.对于需要镇静的儿童,在腹部CT检查前使用肠道对比剂是否安全?水合氯醛和戊巴比妥的应用经验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jan;180(1):13-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800013.
10
The use of oral pentobarbital sodium (Nembutal) versus oral chloral hydrate in infants undergoing CT and MR imaging--a pilot study.口服戊巴比妥钠(速可眠)与口服水合氯醛用于接受CT和MRI成像检查的婴儿的比较——一项初步研究。
Pediatr Radiol. 2000 May;30(5):332-5. doi: 10.1007/s002470050752.

引用本文的文献

1
Paediatric sedation for imaging is safe and effective in a district general hospital.在地区综合医院中,用于影像学检查的儿科镇静是安全有效的。
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150483. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150483. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
2
Options and Considerations for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Imaging.儿科影像检查中程序性镇静的选择与注意事项
Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Oct;17(5):385-99. doi: 10.1007/s40272-015-0140-6.
3
Comparative review of the adverse effects of sedatives used in children undergoing outpatient procedures.门诊手术患儿使用镇静剂的不良反应比较综述
Drug Saf. 1996 Mar;14(3):146-57. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199614030-00002.
4
Sedation for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: efficacy and safety of rectal thiopental.接受磁共振成像检查的儿童镇静:直肠硫喷妥钠的有效性和安全性
Eur J Pediatr. 1996 Sep;155(9):820-2.