Valdés L, San José E, Alvarez D, Sarandeses A, Pose A, Chomón B, Alvarez-Dobaño J M, Salgueiro M, Rodríguez Suárez J R
Unidad de Neumología, Hospital Provincial, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Chest. 1993 Feb;103(2):458-65. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.2.458.
We compared the parameters pleural adenosine deaminase (PADA, determined in 405 patients), the PADA/serum ADA ratio (P/SADA; 276 cases), pleural lysozyme (PLYS, 276 cases), the PLYS/serum LYS ratio (P/SLYS; 276 cases), and pleural interferon gamma (IFN, 145 cases) regarding their ability to differentiate tuberculous pleural effusions from others. The 405 pleural effusions were classified by previously established criteria as tuberculous (91), neoplastic (110), parapneumonic (58), empyemas (10), transudates (88), or miscellaneous (48). The intermean differences between the tuberculous group and each of the others were statistically significant for all five parameters (p < 0.01 for PLYS and P/SLYS with respect to the empyema group; p < 0.001 otherwise), except for PADA and P/SADA with respect to the empyema group. All the tuberculous pleurisy cases had PADA values of 47 U/L or more, as compared to only 5 percent of the other cases (sensitivity, 100 percent; specificity, 95 percent). P/SADA was above 1.5 in 85.7 percent of tuberculous effusions and 11 percent of the others (sensitivity, 85.7 percent; specificity, 89 percent). PLYS, with a diagnostic threshold of 15 g/ml, had a sensitivity of 85.7 percent and a specificity of 61.6 percent; P/SLYS, with a threshold of 1.1, had a sensitivity of 67.3 percent and a specificity of 90.3 percent; and IFN, with a threshold of 140 pg/ml, had a sensitivity of 94.2 percent and a specificity of 91.8 percent. The lowest misclassification rate was achieved by PADA, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) with respect to P/SADA, PLYS, and P/SLYS, but not with respect to IFN. The only significant pairwise correlations among these parameters were between P/SLYS and PADA and between P/SLYS and P/SADA. We conclude that PADA and IFN are useful parameters for early diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy, and that the other parameters considered have no advantages over PADA and IFN for this purpose (though the high specificity of P/SLYS may be noted).
我们比较了胸膜腺苷脱氨酶(PADA,405例患者中检测)、PADA/血清ADA比值(P/SADA;276例)、胸膜溶菌酶(PLYS,276例)、PLYS/血清LYS比值(P/SLYS;276例)以及胸膜干扰素γ(IFN,145例)区分结核性胸腔积液与其他类型胸腔积液的能力。405例胸腔积液根据先前确立的标准分为结核性(91例)、肿瘤性(110例)、类肺炎性(58例)、脓胸(10例)、漏出液(88例)或其他(48例)。结核性组与其他各组之间,所有这五个参数的组间均值差异均具有统计学意义(PLYS和P/SLYS与脓胸组相比p < 0.01;其他情况p < 0.001),但PADA和P/SADA与脓胸组相比除外。所有结核性胸膜炎病例的PADA值均为47 U/L或更高,而其他病例仅5%如此(敏感性为100%;特异性为95%)。85.7%的结核性胸腔积液P/SADA高于1.5,其他胸腔积液为11%(敏感性为85.7%;特异性为89%)。诊断阈值为15 μg/ml时,PLYS的敏感性为85.7%,特异性为61.6%;阈值为1.1时,P/SLYS的敏感性为67.3%,特异性为90.3%;阈值为140 pg/ml时,IFN的敏感性为94.2%,特异性为91.8%。PADA的错误分类率最低,与P/SADA、PLYS和P/SLYS相比有统计学显著差异(p < 0.001),但与IFN相比无差异。这些参数之间唯一显著的成对相关性是P/SLYS与PADA之间以及P/SLYS与P/SADA之间。我们得出结论,PADA和IFN是结核性胸膜炎早期诊断的有用参数,并且为此目的所考虑的其他参数相对于PADA和IFN并无优势(不过可注意到P/SLYS的高特异性)。