Waterman B, Lewandowski L
State University of NY, Oswego.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Feb;55(1):87-103. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1004.
The purpose of the following study was to replicate the confusability paradigm of Byrne and Shea (1979) by examining phonologic and semantic performances of good and poor readers. This study added an older age group and a phonological awareness task to examine other aspects of phonological processing across age. The confusability tasks included a pseudoword recognition task with only phonological information available for coding and a word recognition task with both phonetic and semantic information available for coding. Forty poor readers and 40 good readers were divided into two separate age groups (8-10 years, 14-16 years). Rhyming, semantic, control, and general errors were recorded. On the pseudoword task poor readers' rhyming versus control errors increased whereas good readers' rhyming versus control errors decreased with age. On the word task poor readers made more errors on semantic than rhyming trials while good readers made more rhyming than semantic errors. Poor readers made significantly more errors on the phonological awareness task than good readers. The combined results suggest, as did Byrne and Shea, that poor readers have a weak-functioning phonological system which they rely upon less when semantic information is available for coding.
以下研究的目的是通过考察优秀读者和阅读能力较差读者的语音及语义表现,来复制伯恩和谢伊(1979)的混淆范式。本研究增加了一个年龄较大的组别以及一项语音意识任务,以考察不同年龄段语音处理的其他方面。混淆任务包括一个仅提供语音信息用于编码的假词识别任务,以及一个同时提供语音和语义信息用于编码的单词识别任务。40名阅读能力较差的读者和40名优秀读者被分成两个独立的年龄组(8至10岁,14至16岁)。记录押韵、语义、控制和一般性错误。在假词任务中,阅读能力较差的读者押韵错误与控制错误的比例随年龄增长而增加,而优秀读者押韵错误与控制错误的比例则随年龄增长而下降。在单词任务中,阅读能力较差的读者在语义试验中犯的错误比押韵试验中更多,而优秀读者在押韵试验中犯的错误比语义试验中更多。阅读能力较差的读者在语音意识任务中犯的错误明显多于优秀读者。综合结果表明,与伯恩和谢伊的研究结果一样,阅读能力较差的读者拥有一个功能较弱的语音系统,当有语义信息可用于编码时,他们对该系统的依赖程度较低。