• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[七氟醚与氟烷用于小儿麻醉的比较]

[Comparison of sevoflurane and halothane in pediatric anesthesia].

作者信息

Furuya Y, Tachibana C, Kobayashi N, Fukada T, Sato K, Ohe Y

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Women's Medical College Daini Hospital.

出版信息

Masui. 1993 Jan;42(1):46-51.

PMID:8433491
Abstract

In the present study we compared sevoflurane (group S) and halothane (group F) as used in pediatric endotracheal anesthesia. The subjects consisted of 100 pediatric patients, each 50 in group S and F, most of whom underwent otorhinolaryngological surgery. Anesthesia was induced with nitrous oxide-oxygen-sevoflurane (GOS) (S 3-5%) or nitrous oxide-oxygen-halothane (GOF) (F 1.5-2.5%), and maintained with GOS (S 2-3%) or GOF (F 1.0-1.5%). In comparing the groups with respect to anesthetic induction, group S required 2.1 min for the loss of consciousness, 6.1 min for ocular fixation and 9.7 min for completion of intubation, while in group F the time intervals for the above items were 2.4, 4.9 and 10.2 min, respectively. No significant differences were found between the two groups except in the loss of consciousness and ocular fixation. Comparison of the groups during maintenance of anesthesia revealed no significant differences, although pulse rate and diastolic blood pressure increased in both groups. When the groups were compared for awakening from anesthesia, group S required 10.1 min for awakening and 11.9 min for extubation, while in group F the time was 13.0 min and 15.4 min, respectively. These values were significantly different. The present study demonstrated that sevoflurane anesthesia is rapid in both induction and awakening as compared with halothane anesthesia, and that GOS inhalation anesthesia with single use of sevoflurane can be usefully applied to pediatric endotracheal anesthesia.

摘要

在本研究中,我们比较了七氟醚(S组)和氟烷(F组)在小儿气管内麻醉中的应用。研究对象为100例小儿患者,S组和F组各50例,大多数患者接受耳鼻喉科手术。麻醉诱导采用氧化亚氮-氧气-七氟醚(GOS)(S组3-5%)或氧化亚氮-氧气-氟烷(GOF)(F组1.5-2.5%),维持麻醉采用GOS(S组2-3%)或GOF(F组1.0-1.5%)。在比较两组的麻醉诱导情况时,S组意识消失所需时间为2.1分钟,眼球固定所需时间为6.1分钟,插管完成所需时间为9.7分钟,而F组上述各项时间分别为2.4分钟、4.9分钟和10.2分钟。除意识消失和眼球固定外,两组之间未发现显著差异。麻醉维持期间两组比较未发现显著差异,尽管两组的脉搏率和舒张压均升高。在比较两组麻醉苏醒情况时,S组苏醒所需时间为10.1分钟,拔管所需时间为11.9分钟,而F组的时间分别为13.0分钟和15.4分钟。这些数值有显著差异。本研究表明,与氟烷麻醉相比,七氟醚麻醉在诱导和苏醒方面都很快,并且单次使用七氟醚的GOS吸入麻醉可有效地应用于小儿气管内麻醉。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of sevoflurane and halothane in pediatric anesthesia].[七氟醚与氟烷用于小儿麻醉的比较]
Masui. 1993 Jan;42(1):46-51.
2
Clinical characteristics of sevoflurane in children. A comparison with halothane.七氟烷用于儿童的临床特征。与氟烷的比较。
Anesthesiology. 1995 Jan;82(1):38-46. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199501000-00006.
3
[Comparison of intubating condition under sevoflurane and halothane anesthesia in pediatric patients].[七氟醚与氟烷麻醉下小儿患者插管条件的比较]
Masui. 1995 Feb;44(2):239-43.
4
[Comparative study of recovery from general anesthesia with halothane or sevoflurane in pediatrics].[小儿使用氟烷或七氟醚全身麻醉后恢复情况的比较研究]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1996 Oct;43(8):272-5.
5
[Comparative study of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide versus halothane and nitrous oxide in pediatric anesthesia: efficacy and hemodynamic characteristics during induction].七氟醚与氧化亚氮联用对比氟烷与氧化亚氮联用在小儿麻醉中的效果:诱导期疗效及血流动力学特征的比较研究
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1998 Apr;45(4):126-9.
6
Comparison of sevoflurane with halothane in pediatric ambulatory anesthesia: an experience in Taiwan.七氟烷与氟烷用于小儿门诊麻醉的比较:台湾地区的经验
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1997 Mar;35(1):21-4.
7
A comparison of the induction characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane in children.七氟醚与氟烷在儿童中的诱导特性比较。
Anaesthesia. 1996 Jun;51(6):539-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb12559.x.
8
Rapid induction of anesthesia with high concentrations of halothane or sevoflurane in children.在儿童中使用高浓度氟烷或七氟醚快速诱导麻醉。
J Clin Anesth. 2000 May;12(3):184-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00138-0.
9
Single-breath vital capacity rapid inhalation induction in children: 8% sevoflurane versus 5% halothane.
Anesthesiology. 1998 Aug;89(2):379-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199808000-00014.
10
Rapid inhalation induction in children: 8% sevoflurane compared with 5% halothane.儿童快速吸入诱导:8%七氟醚与5%氟烷的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;78(4):362-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.4.362.

引用本文的文献

1
Sevoflurane in paediatric anaesthesia: a review.七氟醚在小儿麻醉中的应用:综述
Paediatr Drugs. 1999 Apr-Jun;1(2):127-53. doi: 10.2165/00128072-199901020-00005.
2
Sevoflurane. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and its clinical use in general anaesthesia.七氟烷。其药效学和药代动力学特性及其在全身麻醉中的临床应用综述。
Drugs. 1996 Apr;51(4):658-700. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651040-00009.