Graves G R, Gotelli N J
Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 15;90(4):1388-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1388.
Diamond's "assembly rules" model posits that competitive interactions among species govern the composition of avifaunas. Although originally applied to islands in archipelagoes, this controversial set of hypotheses is difficult to test because islands differ in habitat and resource availability, colonization history, and stochastic effects. Permanent mixed-species flocks of Amazonian birds are a model system for testing the assembly rules hypothesis because flocks occur in relatively homogeneous tracts of rain forest and because resident species are potentially interactive from minute to minute. To analyze cooccurrence patterns of species in flocks, we used null models that incorporate realistic autecological colonization parameters. Potentially competing pairs of congeneric species with similar ecologies cooccur in flocks less often than expected by chance, resulting in perfect checkerboard distributions. Interactions among more distantly related species, however, appear to have little effect on the assembly of mixed-species flocks. Checkerboard distributions enhance local species diversity within habitats by generating different combinations of species in different flocks. This process may have contributed to the immense species richness of the Amazonian avifauna.
戴蒙德的“集合规则”模型假定,物种间的竞争相互作用决定了鸟类群落的组成。尽管该模型最初应用于群岛中的岛屿,但这组颇具争议的假说很难得到验证,因为不同岛屿在栖息地、资源可利用性、物种定居历史以及随机效应等方面存在差异。亚马逊地区鸟类的永久性混合物种群是检验集合规则假说的一个模型系统,这是因为鸟群出现在相对同质的热带雨林区域,而且留鸟物种可能时刻都在相互作用。为了分析鸟群中物种的同域分布模式,我们使用了纳入实际个体生态定居参数的零模型。具有相似生态习性的潜在竞争同属物种对在鸟群中同时出现的频率低于随机预期,从而形成了完美的棋盘式分布。然而,亲缘关系较远的物种之间的相互作用似乎对混合物种群的组成影响不大。棋盘式分布通过在不同鸟群中产生不同的物种组合,提高了栖息地内的局部物种多样性。这一过程可能促进了亚马逊地区鸟类群落极其丰富的物种多样性。