Mann N H, Brown M D, Hertz D B, Enger I, Tompkins J
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jan;18(1):41-53. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199301000-00008.
Patient pain drawings were blindly selected from five lumbar spine disorder categories. The drawings were classified by low-back physicians, discriminant analysis, and several computerized artificial neural network configurations. The purpose was to determine the reliability of the patient pain drawing when diagnosing low-back disorders and to delineate the pain mark patterns particular to each disorder by comparing physicians with computerized methods. The physicians averaged 51% accuracy with individual preferences for certain disorder groups. The computerized methods demonstrated comparable accuracy (48%) and more agreement in classification. Associations were found between the predicted pain patterns for each diagnostic group made by an expert and the patterns generated by computerized methods. Variances in these associations are instructive to clinicians for making accurate predictions of diagnosis from pain drawings.
患者疼痛图是从五类腰椎疾病中随机选取的。这些图由腰椎科医生、判别分析以及几种计算机化人工神经网络配置进行分类。目的是确定患者疼痛图在诊断腰椎疾病时的可靠性,并通过将医生的诊断方法与计算机化方法进行比较,描绘出每种疾病特有的疼痛标记模式。医生的诊断准确率平均为51%,且对某些疾病组有个人偏好。计算机化方法显示出相当的准确率(48%),并且在分类上有更多的一致性。专家对每个诊断组预测的疼痛模式与计算机化方法生成的模式之间存在关联。这些关联中的差异对临床医生根据疼痛图进行准确的诊断预测具有指导意义。