Uyttenbroeck W, Cooreman W, Scharpe S
Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, University Antwerp, Wilrijk.
Ann Clin Biochem. 1993 Jan;30 ( Pt 1):83-6. doi: 10.1177/000456329303000114.
A commercial immunoblotting kit has recently been introduced to determine auto-antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens. We compared this new test with radial immunodiffusion for its usefulness in the routine laboratory procedures of a general hospital. Antigen preparation in immunoblotting includes a protein denaturation step prior to electrophoretic separation of the different proteins. In this way antigenic determinants that depend heavily on the protein superstructure are lost. In theory, auto-antibodies against these epitopes may be missed. In our series of 100 samples that had tested positively for antinuclear antibodies, radial immunodiffusion was able to detect one SSA positive sample that was negative by immunoblotting. However, 47 samples positive in immunoblotting, 37 positive for UBP, seven for anti-SSA, are for anti-Jo-1, one for anti-RNP and one for anti-Sm were missed by radial immunodiffusion. Most of these samples had low antinuclear antibody titres (1/80 or 1/160).
最近推出了一种商用免疫印迹试剂盒,用于检测抗可提取核抗原的自身抗体。我们将这项新检测与放射免疫扩散法进行了比较,以评估其在综合医院常规实验室操作中的实用性。免疫印迹中的抗原制备包括在对不同蛋白质进行电泳分离之前的蛋白质变性步骤。通过这种方式,严重依赖蛋白质超结构的抗原决定簇会丢失。理论上,针对这些表位的自身抗体可能会被漏检。在我们检测抗核抗体呈阳性的100份样本中,放射免疫扩散法能够检测出1份免疫印迹法呈阴性的SSA阳性样本。然而,放射免疫扩散法漏检了免疫印迹法呈阳性的47份样本,其中37份为UBP阳性,7份为抗SSA阳性,1份为抗Jo-1阳性,1份为抗RNP阳性,1份为抗Sm阳性。这些样本中的大多数抗核抗体滴度较低(1/80或1/160)。