• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PAR指数与萨默斯咬合指数的可靠性和有效性比较。

A comparison of the reliability and validity of the PAR Index and Summers' Occlusal Index.

作者信息

Buchanan I B, Shaw W C, Richmond S, O'Brien K D, Andrews M

机构信息

Orthodontic Department, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 1993 Feb;15(1):27-31. doi: 10.1093/ejo/15.1.27.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/15.1.27
PMID:8436194
Abstract

The PAR index and Summers' Occlusal Index have both been used to assess orthodontic treatment standards. The validity and reliability of these two indices is compared when applied to a group of 80 study models. The more recently developed PAR index was found to be as reliable and as valid as Summers' Occlusal Index.

摘要

PAR指数和萨默斯咬合指数都已被用于评估正畸治疗标准。将这两种指数应用于一组80个研究模型时,对它们的有效性和可靠性进行了比较。结果发现,较新开发的PAR指数与萨默斯咬合指数一样可靠且有效。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the reliability and validity of the PAR Index and Summers' Occlusal Index.PAR指数与萨默斯咬合指数的可靠性和有效性比较。
Eur J Orthod. 1993 Feb;15(1):27-31. doi: 10.1093/ejo/15.1.27.
2
The first 100 cases of orthodontic treatment: one year out of retention.首批100例正畸治疗病例:保持期结束一年后。
Dent Update. 1994 Sep;21(7):288-92, 294-7.
3
The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.错颌畸形严重程度和治疗难度的同伴评估评分指数的验证
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Feb;107(2):172-6. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70133-8.
4
Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.石膏模型和基于计算机的数字模型的同行评估评级(PAR)指数得分比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):431-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.035.
5
A pilot study to assess the validity of the Orthodontic Treatment Priority Index in English schoolchildren.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1974;2(5):246-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1974.tb01659.x.
6
Variability in recording and grading the need for orthodontic treatment using the handicapping malocclusion assessment record, occlusal index and dental aesthetic index.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;24(3):222-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00846.x.
7
An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system.同行评估评级(PAR)指数评估及新权重系统建议
Eur J Orthod. 1999 Apr;21(2):181-92. doi: 10.1093/ejo/21.2.181.
8
Effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in adults and adolescents.成人和青少年正畸治疗的有效性及疗程
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Oct;114(4):383-6. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70182-9.
9
Correlation between centric relation–maximum intercuspation discrepancy and temporomandibular joint dysfunction.正中关系-最大牙尖交错位差异与颞下颌关节紊乱的相关性。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2010 Nov;68(6):368-76. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2010.517552.
10
An introduction to indices of malocclusion.错牙合指数介绍。
Dent Update. 1994 May;21(4):140-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the Peer Assessment Rating index a valid measure for change in Oral Health-Related Quality of Life following orthodontic treatment? Results of a cohort study.正畸治疗后,同伴评估评分指数是否是口腔健康相关生活质量变化的有效衡量指标?一项队列研究的结果。
Angle Orthod. 2025 Mar 5;95(4):438-44. doi: 10.2319/091924-769.1.
2
Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate.使用同伴评估评分(PAR)指数评估非综合征性单侧唇腭裂患者的正畸治疗效果。
J Orthod Sci. 2020 Nov 2;9:17. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_4_20. eCollection 2020.
3
Orthodontic Class II:1 treatment-efficiency and outcome quality of Herbst-multibracket appliance therapy.
骨性Ⅱ类:1. Herbst 多用途矫正器治疗的疗效和治疗结果质量。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jun;22(5):2005-2011. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2294-9. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
Quality of orthodontic treatment performed by orthodontists and general dentists.正畸医生和普通牙医进行的正畸治疗的质量。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jan;82(1):102-6. doi: 10.2319/061311-389.1. Epub 2011 Aug 1.