• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Variability in recording and grading the need for orthodontic treatment using the handicapping malocclusion assessment record, occlusal index and dental aesthetic index.

作者信息

Otuyemi O D, Noar J H

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Mddx, England.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;24(3):222-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00846.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00846.x
PMID:8871024
Abstract

This investigation evaluates three malocclusion treatment need indices, the Handicapping Malocclusion Assessment Record (HMAR), the Occlusal Index (OI) and the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), for reliability and inter-index correlation. Pretreatment study models of 30 cases (mean age 12.9 years, SD 1.2) were assessed using each index. All the indices demonstrated a high level of reliability and non could be selected over the other with regards intra-examiner differences. The DAI, however, was more time-saving (2.68 mins, SD 0.41) and simple to use. The highest correlation was between HMAR and OI (r = 0.87, P < 0.001) which is a reflection of the similarity in their design. This study also discusses the limitations of the three indices.

摘要

相似文献

1
Variability in recording and grading the need for orthodontic treatment using the handicapping malocclusion assessment record, occlusal index and dental aesthetic index.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;24(3):222-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00846.x.
2
A comparison between DAI and SCAN in estimating orthodontic treatment need.DAI与SCAN在评估正畸治疗需求方面的比较。
Int Dent J. 1996 Feb;46(1):35-40.
3
A validation study of three indexes of orthodontic treatment need in the United States.美国正畸治疗需求三项指标的验证研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;25(5):358-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00955.x.
4
A comparison of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need applied clinically and to diagnostic records.
Br J Orthod. 1994 May;21(2):185-8. doi: 10.1179/bjo.21.2.185.
5
Dentists variation in the determination of orthodontic treatment need.牙医在正畸治疗需求判定方面的差异。
Br J Orthod. 1994 Feb;21(1):65-8. doi: 10.1179/bjo.21.1.65.
6
Epidemiology of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of 12-13-year-old Malaysian schoolchildren.马来西亚12至13岁在校儿童的错颌畸形流行病学及正畸治疗需求
Community Dent Health. 2001 Mar;18(1):31-6.
7
Application of the dental aesthetic index in the prioritisation of orthodontic service needs.牙科美学指数在正畸服务需求优先级排序中的应用。
SADJ. 2012 Aug;67(7):380-3.
8
Establishing malocclusion severity levels on the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale.在牙科美学指数(DAI)量表上确定错颌畸形的严重程度等级。
Aust Dent J. 1996 Feb;41(1):43-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1996.tb05654.x.
9
[Orthodontic treatment needs and indications assessed with IONT].[用IONT评估正畸治疗需求和适应症]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2004;50(1):115-22.
10
A comparison of two methods of assessing orthodontic treatment need in the mixed dentition: DAI and IOTN.混合牙列期两种评估正畸治疗需求方法的比较:DAI与IOTN。
Aust Orthod J. 2000 Jul;16(2):82-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index as an Alternative for Orthodontic Treatment Need Decision in Relation to Angle Classification.同伴评估评分(PAR)指数作为与安氏分类相关的正畸治疗需求决策的替代方法。
Turk J Orthod. 2019 Mar;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18048. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
2
The relationship of dental aesthetic index with dental appearance, smile and desire for orthodontic correction.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 May;2(2):6-12. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1023. Epub 2009 Aug 26.