Glendinning D S, Vierck C J
Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Neurology. 1993 Feb;43(2):363-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.2.363.
Previous psychophysical examinations of the effects of dorsal column (DC) lesions on proprioception of the lower extremity have not revealed disturbances in proprioception, and there have been no similar experiments for the upper extremity. To evaluate the effect of DC lesions on upper extremity proprioception, we tested two monkeys with a variation of the typical clinical test for position sense. This test required the monkeys to detect the direction of a passive displacement of the finger. We identified proprioceptive deficits in one monkey following a DC lesion, but only when the finger was displaced with a small (< 14 degrees), slow (< 7 degrees/sec) movement. When we included displacements of all sizes and velocities in the analysis, performance was unaffected by the DC lesions in either monkey. Since the standard test for proprioception does not specify the speed and size of movements, we conclude that this test is not a valid method for estimating damage to the DCs.
先前关于背柱(DC)损伤对下肢本体感觉影响的心理物理学检查并未发现本体感觉障碍,且尚未有针对上肢的类似实验。为评估DC损伤对上肢本体感觉的影响,我们对两只猴子进行了一项对位置觉典型临床测试的变体测试。该测试要求猴子检测手指被动位移的方向。我们在一只猴子身上发现了DC损伤后存在本体感觉缺陷,但仅在手指以小(<14度)、慢(<7度/秒)的动作位移时出现。当我们在分析中纳入所有大小和速度的位移时,两只猴子的表现均未受DC损伤的影响。由于本体感觉的标准测试未明确动作的速度和大小,我们得出结论,该测试并非评估DC损伤的有效方法。