• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于复合机器人的上肢本体感觉测量。

A composite robotic-based measure of upper limb proprioception.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Calgary Stroke Program, Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Radiology, Community Health Sciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Nov 13;14(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0329-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12984-017-0329-8
PMID:29132388
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5683446/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proprioception is the sense of the position and movement of our limbs, and is vital for executing coordinated movements. Proprioceptive disorders are common following stroke, but clinical tests for measuring impairments in proprioception are simple ordinal scales that are unreliable and relatively crude. We developed and validated specific kinematic parameters to quantify proprioception and compared two common metrics, Euclidean and Mahalanobis distances, to combine these parameters into an overall summary score of proprioception.

METHODS

We used the KINARM robotic exoskeleton to assess proprioception of the upper limb in subjects with stroke (N = 285. Mean days post-stroke = 12 ± 15). Two aspects of proprioception (position sense and kinesthetic sense) were tested using two mirror-matching tasks without vision. The tasks produced 12 parameters to quantify position sense and eight to quantify kinesthesia. The Euclidean and Mahalanobis distances of the z-scores for these parameters were computed each for position sense, kinesthetic sense, and overall proprioceptive function (average score of position and kinesthetic sense).

RESULTS

A high proportion of stroke subjects were impaired on position matching (57%), kinesthetic matching (65%), and overall proprioception (62%). Robotic tasks were significantly correlated with clinical measures of upper extremity proprioception, motor impairment, and overall functional independence. Composite scores derived from the Euclidean distance and Mahalanobis distance showed strong content validity as they were highly correlated (r = 0.97-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

We have outlined a composite measure of upper extremity proprioception to provide a single continuous outcome measure of proprioceptive function for use in clinical trials of rehabilitation. Multiple aspects of proprioception including sense of position, direction, speed, and amplitude of movement were incorporated into this measure. Despite similarities in the scores obtained with these two distance metrics, the Mahalanobis distance was preferred.

摘要

背景

本体感觉是我们四肢位置和运动的感觉,对于执行协调运动至关重要。本体感觉障碍在中风后很常见,但用于测量本体感觉障碍的临床测试是简单的序数量表,这些量表既不可靠又相对粗糙。我们开发并验证了特定的运动学参数来量化本体感觉,并比较了两种常用的度量标准,即欧几里得距离和马氏距离,将这些参数组合成本体感觉的总体综合评分。

方法

我们使用 KINARM 机器人外骨骼来评估中风患者(N=285. 中风后平均天数为 12±15 天)的上肢本体感觉。使用两个没有视觉的镜像匹配任务来测试本体感觉的两个方面(位置感和运动感觉)。这些任务产生了 12 个参数来量化位置感和 8 个参数来量化运动感觉。计算这些参数的 z 分数的欧几里得距离和马氏距离,分别用于位置感、运动感觉和整体本体感觉功能(位置和运动感觉的平均得分)。

结果

相当比例的中风患者在位置匹配(57%)、运动感觉匹配(65%)和整体本体感觉(62%)方面存在障碍。机器人任务与上肢本体感觉、运动障碍和整体功能独立性的临床测量有显著相关性。基于欧几里得距离和马氏距离得出的综合评分具有很强的内容有效性,因为它们高度相关(r=0.97-0.99)。

结论

我们概述了一种上肢本体感觉的综合测量方法,为康复临床试验提供了一种单一的连续本体感觉功能测量方法。该测量方法纳入了本体感觉的多个方面,包括位置感、方向感、运动速度和运动幅度。尽管这两种距离度量标准的得分相似,但马氏距离更受青睐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ddb/5683446/a543dfeabef7/12984_2017_329_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ddb/5683446/b535a9bfc3f0/12984_2017_329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ddb/5683446/98cccb806dc4/12984_2017_329_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ddb/5683446/a543dfeabef7/12984_2017_329_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ddb/5683446/b535a9bfc3f0/12984_2017_329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ddb/5683446/98cccb806dc4/12984_2017_329_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ddb/5683446/a543dfeabef7/12984_2017_329_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A composite robotic-based measure of upper limb proprioception.基于复合机器人的上肢本体感觉测量。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Nov 13;14(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0329-8.
2
Vision of the upper limb fails to compensate for kinesthetic impairments in subacute stroke.上肢视觉无法代偿亚急性脑卒中的动觉障碍。
Cortex. 2018 Dec;109:245-259. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
3
Relative independence of upper limb position sense and reaching in children with hemiparetic perinatal stroke.围产期卒中所致偏瘫儿童上肢位置觉和伸手运动的相对独立性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 May 12;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00869-5.
4
Anatomical correlates of proprioceptive impairments following acute stroke: a case series.急性卒中后本体感觉障碍的解剖学关联:病例系列
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Jul 15;342(1-2):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
5
Inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the KINARM robotic exoskeleton.使用KINARM机器人外骨骼进行运动觉测量的评分者间信度。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 May 22;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0260-z.
6
Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton.脑卒中后痉挛的运动学和本体感觉:使用 Kinarm 机器人外骨骼评估。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Nov 21;16(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0618-5.
7
Differential loss of position sense and kinesthesia in sub-acute stroke.亚急性脑卒中患者位置觉和运动觉的差异丧失。
Cortex. 2019 Dec;121:414-426. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
8
The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke.脑卒中后位置觉和视觉引导的伸手运动独立性丧失。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Oct 4;9:72. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-72.
9
Robotic identification of kinesthetic deficits after stroke.机器人识别脑卒中后的动觉缺陷。
Stroke. 2013 Dec;44(12):3414-21. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002058. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
10
Kinesthetic deficits after perinatal stroke: robotic measurement in hemiparetic children.围产期卒中后的运动觉缺陷:偏瘫儿童的机器人测量
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Feb 15;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0221-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of technology-assisted matching paradigms in post-stroke upper limb proprioceptive assessment: a scoping review.中风后上肢本体感觉评估中技术辅助匹配范式的心理测量特性:一项范围综述
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 26;16:1556111. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1556111. eCollection 2025.
2
Robotic Rigor: Validity of the Kinarm End-Point Robot Visually Guided Reaching Test in Multiple Sclerosis.机器人精确性:Kinarm 端点机器人视觉引导伸手测试在多发性硬化症中的有效性
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024 Nov 6;6(4):100382. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100382. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Robot-aided assessment and associated brain lesions of impaired ankle proprioception in chronic stroke.

本文引用的文献

1
Localization of Impaired Kinesthetic Processing Post-stroke.中风后本体感觉处理受损的定位
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Oct 17;10:505. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00505. eCollection 2016.
2
A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke.一种基于机器人的行为任务,用于量化中风后快速运动决策和行动中的损伤。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0201-2.
3
Central perception of position sense involves a distributed neural network - Evidence from lesion-behavior analyses.
机器人辅助评估与慢性脑卒中踝关节本体感觉障碍相关的脑损伤。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Jun 24;21(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01396-9.
4
Impaired proprioception and magnified scaling of proprioceptive error responses in chronic stroke.慢性脑卒中患者本体感觉受损,本体感觉误差反应放大。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Apr 9;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01350-9.
5
Resting state functional connectivity associated with impaired proprioception post-stroke.卒中后本体感觉障碍与静息状态功能连接相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jan;45(1):e26541. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26541. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
6
Aging increases proprioceptive error for a broad range of movement speed and distance estimates in the upper limb.衰老会增加上肢在广泛的运动速度和距离估计范围内的本体感觉误差。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Oct 11;17:1217105. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1217105. eCollection 2023.
7
The use of machine learning and deep learning techniques to assess proprioceptive impairments of the upper limb after stroke.使用机器学习和深度学习技术评估脑卒中后上肢本体感觉障碍。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Jan 27;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01140-9.
8
Enhancing touch sensibility by sensory retraining in a sensory discrimination task haptic rendering.在感觉辨别任务触觉渲染中通过感觉再训练增强触觉敏感性。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Aug 1;3:929431. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.929431. eCollection 2022.
9
Effects of a Novel Proprioceptive Rehabilitation Device on Shoulder Joint Position Sense, Pain and Function.新型本体感觉康复设备对肩关节位置觉、疼痛和功能的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 9;58(9):1248. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091248.
10
Reliable and Valid Robotic Assessments of Hand Active and Passive Position Sense in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy.对单侧脑瘫儿童手部主动和被动位置觉进行可靠且有效的机器人评估
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 1;16:895080. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.895080. eCollection 2022.
位置觉的中枢感知涉及一个分布式神经网络——来自病变-行为分析的证据。
Cortex. 2016 Jun;79:42-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
4
Evaluating Outlier Identification Tests: Mahalanobis D Squared and Comrey Dk.评估异常值识别测试:马氏平方距离和康瑞 Dk
Multivariate Behav Res. 1988 Apr 1;23(2):189-202. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2302_4.
5
Reliability of dissimilarity measures for multi-voxel pattern analysis.用于多体素模式分析的差异度量的可靠性
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:188-200. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
6
Examining Differences in Patterns of Sensory and Motor Recovery After Stroke With Robotics.使用机器人技术研究中风后感觉和运动恢复模式的差异。
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3459-69. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010750. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
7
Robotic therapy for chronic stroke: general recovery of impairment or improved task-specific skill?慢性中风的机器人疗法:是损伤的全面恢复还是特定任务技能的改善?
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;114(3):1885-94. doi: 10.1152/jn.00336.2015. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Somatosensory assessment and treatment after stroke: An evidence-practice gap.中风后的体感评估与治疗:证据与实践的差距。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Apr;62(2):93-104. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12170. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
9
The arm motion detection (AMD) test.手臂运动检测(AMD)测试。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5349-52. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944834.
10
Recognizing upper limb movements with wrist worn inertial sensors using k-means clustering classification.使用k均值聚类分类法通过腕部佩戴的惯性传感器识别上肢运动。
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Apr;40:59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Dec 19.