Riou B, Berdeaux A, Pussard E, Giudicelli J F
Laboratorire de Pharmacologie, Université Paris Sud, Le Bicêtre, France.
Intensive Care Med. 1993;19(1):26-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01709274.
The hemodynamic effects of two cyanide antidotes, hydroxocobalamin and cobalt edetate were compared.
This experimental study was performed in chronically instrumented conscious dogs and at equipotent cyanide antidotal doses (hydroxocobalamin 70 mg.kg-1; cobalt edetate 10.5 mg.kg-1).
Peak plasma cobalt concentrations did not differ in the two groups (412 +/- 183 vs 400 +/- 160 mumol.l-1). Hydroxocobalamin induced a slight increase in mean arterial pressure (+17 +/- 9%, p < 0.05) and systemic resistance (+19 +/- 15%, p < 0.05). In contrast, cobalt edetate induced an increase in heart rate (+78 +/- 33%, p < 0.05), in cardiac output (+63 +/- 39%, p < 0.05), and in maximum rise of left ventricular pressure (+33 +/- 15%, p < 0.05), did not modify mean arterial pressure, and decreased systemic resistance (-36 +/- 15%, p < 0.05). These hemodynamic effects were associated with an increase in plasma catecholamine concentrations (epinephrine: 2524 +/- 3025 vs. 58 +/- 37 pg.ml-1, p < 0.05; norepinephrine: 1106 +/- 609 vs. 343 +/- 146 pg.ml-1, p < 0.05), which in contrast remained unchanged after hydroxocobalamin administration. Cobalt edetate also induced an increase in blood glucose concentrations (9.9 +/- 1.9 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.2 mmol.l-1, p < 0.05) and a moderate metabolic acidosis, whereas hydroxocobalamin did not. After adrenergic (alpha 1, beta) and cholinergic receptor blockade, cobalt edetate did not modify heart rate and various indices of cardiac function, suggesting that it has no direct cardiac effects.
Considering its lack of hemodynamically relevant effects, these results indicate that hydroxocobalamin is potentially a safer cyanide antidote than cobalt edetate.
比较两种氰化物解毒剂——羟钴胺和依地酸钴的血流动力学效应。
本实验研究在长期植入监测装置的清醒犬身上进行,使用等效的氰化物解毒剂量(羟钴胺70mg·kg⁻¹;依地酸钴10.5mg·kg⁻¹)。
两组的血浆钴峰值浓度无差异(412±183对400±160μmol·L⁻¹)。羟钴胺使平均动脉压略有升高(+17±9%,p<0.05)和全身血管阻力升高(+19±15%,p<0.05)。相比之下,依地酸钴使心率升高(+78±33%,p<0.05)、心输出量升高(+63±39%,p<0.05)以及左心室压力最大上升幅度升高(+33±15%,p<0.05),未改变平均动脉压,并降低全身血管阻力(-36±15%,p<0.05)。这些血流动力学效应与血浆儿茶酚胺浓度升高相关(肾上腺素:2524±3025对58±37pg·ml⁻¹,p<0.05;去甲肾上腺素:1106±609对343±146pg·ml⁻¹,p<0.05),而羟钴胺给药后儿茶酚胺浓度保持不变。依地酸钴还使血糖浓度升高(9.9±1.9对6.1±1.2mmol·L⁻¹,p<0.05)并导致中度代谢性酸中毒,而羟钴胺则无此作用。在肾上腺素能(α1、β)和胆碱能受体阻断后,依地酸钴未改变心率和各种心脏功能指标,表明其无直接心脏效应。
考虑到其缺乏血流动力学相关效应,这些结果表明羟钴胺可能是比依地酸钴更安全的氰化物解毒剂。