Kaiser M K, Phatak A V
NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California 94035-1000.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Feb;19(1):194-202. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.1.194.
Psychologists are intrigued with the idea that optical variables can specify not only the time until an object impacts an observer but also the severity of the impact. However, the mapping between the optical variables (tau and .tau) and the kinematic variables (velocity, acceleration) has been misstated, erroneously implying that there exist critical values of the optical variables used for locomotion and control. In this commentary, the mathematical relationship between the optical and kinematic variables is reexamined and the erroneous assumptions that have led to the proposal of critical values are show. Also examined are the empirical data on deceleration to approach (particularly from active control paradigms) to assess whether the proposed optical variables are likely candidates for control strategies. Finally, problems associated with numerical approximations to dynamic systems, particularly when analytic solutions exist, are discussed.
心理学家们对这样一种观点很感兴趣,即光学变量不仅可以指明物体撞击观察者所需的时间,还能表明撞击的严重程度。然而,光学变量(τ和.tau)与运动学变量(速度、加速度)之间的映射关系被错误表述了,错误地暗示存在用于运动和控制的光学变量的临界值。在这篇评论中,重新审视了光学变量与运动学变量之间的数学关系,并指出了导致提出临界值的错误假设。同时还研究了接近时减速的实证数据(特别是来自主动控制范式的数据),以评估所提出的光学变量是否可能是控制策略的候选变量。最后,讨论了与动态系统数值近似相关的问题,特别是当存在解析解时的情况。