Magnusson A R, Hedges J R, Vanko M, McCarten K, Moorhead J C
Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.
Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Mar;22(3):560-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81942-0.
To identify factors associated with outpatient follow-up of emergency department visits.
A retrospective review of 587 ED charts meeting strict criteria was performed. The following variables were identified: method used to arrange follow-up, age, sex, consultant contacts, distance from patient's residence to hospital, previous physician, recommended time to clinic return, and funding source. Compliance was assessed using the outpatient registration computer data base.
ED and outpatient clinics of an urban university teaching hospital.
Inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 75 years, patient released to outpatient care, and instructions specifying a university hospital clinic or ED follow-up and a time period within which this appointment was to occur. Follow-up options included patients being asked to return to the ED on a specific day (group 1), being given a specific clinic appointment (group 2), or being given the clinic telephone number and instructed to call for an appointment (group 3).
Compliance rates, defined as follow-up within seven days of the recommended date, were group 1, 51%; group 2, 65%; and group 3, 46%. Significant confounding factors adversely affecting follow-up as determined by multiple logistic regression analysis were decreasing age (P < .05), absence of insurance (P < .01), and no ED consultation with follow-up clinic physician (P < .01). Controlling for these factors and the reason for follow-up showed that having the patient schedule their own follow-up was associated with poor follow-up compliance (P < .001).
Compliance with follow-up is multifactorial. Consultant contact at the time of initial patient evaluation and provision of a return visit appointment at the time of ED release should improve compliance in a university hospital setting.
确定与急诊科就诊后门诊随访相关的因素。
对587份符合严格标准的急诊病历进行回顾性研究。确定了以下变量:安排随访的方法、年龄、性别、会诊联系、患者住所到医院的距离、之前的医生、建议返回诊所的时间以及资金来源。使用门诊登记计算机数据库评估依从性。
一所城市大学教学医院的急诊科和门诊诊所。
纳入标准为年龄在18至75岁之间、患者出院后接受门诊治疗,以及有指定大学医院诊所或急诊科随访及预约时间的医嘱。随访选项包括要求患者在特定日期返回急诊科(第1组)、给予特定的门诊预约(第2组)或提供门诊电话号码并指示患者打电话预约(第3组)。
依从率定义为在建议日期的七天内进行随访,第1组为51%;第2组为65%;第3组为46%。经多元逻辑回归分析确定,对随访产生不利影响的显著混杂因素为年龄减小(P < 0.05)、无保险(P < 0.01)以及未与随访诊所医生进行急诊会诊(P < 0.01)。控制这些因素以及随访原因后发现,让患者自行安排随访与随访依从性差相关(P < 0.001)。
随访依从性受多种因素影响。在患者初次评估时进行会诊联系,并在急诊出院时提供复诊预约,应能提高大学医院环境下的依从性。