Suppr超能文献

眼科急诊就诊:与随访失访相关的因素。

Ophthalmic Emergency Department Visits: Factors Associated With Loss to Follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Manhattan Retina and Eye Consultants, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;222:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.038. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe follow-up rates for patients referred for outpatient ophthalmic care after emergency department (ED) discharge and identify patient and visit characteristics associated with loss to follow-up (LTFU).

DESIGN

Single-institution retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We analyzed the medical records of 2,206 patients seen in the ED for an eye-related issue who were subsequently scheduled for ophthalmology follow-up between 2013 and 2019 at a single tertiary health system. The main outcome measures were the frequency of and risk factors for LTFU and ED revisits.

RESULTS

In total, 1,649 (74.8%) patients completed follow-up within 2 months of an index ED visit. In multivariable analysis, younger age (P < .001), a nonurgent ophthalmic condition or nonophthalmic primary diagnosis (P < .001), scheduled follow-up >5 days after the ED visit (P < .001), additional follow-up appointments (<.001), no prior history of ophthalmology appointments (P = .045), a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (P = .027), and having Medicaid or being uninsured (P < .001) were significantly associated with LTFU. The presence of an interpreter significantly increased the likelihood of follow-up among non-English speaking patients (P < .001). LTFU was significantly associated with an ED revisit within 4 months of an index visit, and the ED revisit rate was significantly higher for patients LTFU vs those who completed follow-up (5.7% vs 1.1%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of patients referred for ophthalmic care after an ED presentation were LTFU. We identified numerous factors associated with LTFU that could be used to develop interventions to enhance follow-up. In addition, patients who were LTFU were more likely to revisit the ED for the same ophthalmic condition.

摘要

目的

描述急诊(ED)出院后接受门诊眼科治疗的患者的随访率,并确定与失访(LTFU)相关的患者和就诊特征。

设计

单机构回顾性队列研究。

方法

我们分析了 2013 年至 2019 年期间在单一三级医疗系统接受 ED 眼部相关问题就诊并随后安排眼科随访的 2206 例患者的病历。主要观察指标是 LTFU 和 ED 复诊的频率和危险因素。

结果

共有 1649 例(74.8%)患者在 ED 就诊后 2 个月内完成了随访。多变量分析显示,年龄较小(P <.001)、非紧急眼科状况或非眼科主要诊断(P <.001)、随访预约在 ED 就诊后 5 天以上(P <.001)、额外的随访预约(<.001)、无先前眼科预约史(P=.045)、视力 20/40 或更好(P=.027)以及拥有医疗补助或没有保险(P <.001)与 LTFU 显著相关。有翻译员显著增加了非英语患者就诊的可能性(P <.001)。LTFU 与 ED 就诊后 4 个月内的就诊显著相关,与完成随访的患者相比,LTFU 患者的 ED 复诊率明显更高(5.7% vs 1.1%;P <.001)。

结论

在 ED 就诊后被转介接受眼科治疗的患者中有四分之一失访。我们确定了许多与 LTFU 相关的因素,这些因素可用于制定干预措施以加强随访。此外,失访的患者更有可能因相同的眼部疾病再次就诊 ED。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Implications of Neighborhood- and Patient-Level Factors for Eye Care.社区及患者层面因素对眼科护理的影响
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 1;142(9):854-855. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3066.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Diagnostic error in an ophthalmic emergency department.眼科急诊中的诊断错误。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 May 26;7(2):129-131. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0047.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验