Lewis F J, Quinn M L
Crit Care Med. 1977 Mar-Apr;5(2):73-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-197703000-00002.
We tested a computer system for routine arrhythmia monitoring in 181 postoperative patients in order to evaluate its practical value. There was no significant difference in the incidence of arrhythmias between patients clinically classified in poor condition and those classified in good condition. Conventional vital signs appeared to have more value than a PVC count or an index of arrhythmias. We found no evidence that continuous electrocardiogram monitoring might provide an early warning signal in these patients monitored.
我们对一个用于181例术后患者常规心律失常监测的计算机系统进行了测试，以评估其实际价值。临床分类为病情较差的患者与病情较好的患者之间心律失常的发生率没有显著差异。传统生命体征似乎比室性早搏计数或心律失常指数更有价值。我们没有发现证据表明在这些接受监测的患者中，连续心电图监测可能会提供早期预警信号。
