Garcia-Giralt E, Ayme Y, Carton M, Daban A, Delozier T, Fargeot P, Fumoleau P, Gorins A, Guerin D, Guerin R
Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1992;24(2):139-45. doi: 10.1007/BF01961246.
In order to evaluate the efficacy of two different sequences of second and third line hormonotherapy in advanced post-menopausal breast cancer, 257 women aged 36-91 years (mean age: 63.6 years) who had become resistant to tamoxifen (TAM), entered into a multicenter randomized trial comparing two different regimens: 1) Aminoglutethimide (Ag) 500 mg/day with hydrocortisone supplementation from 30 to 60 mg/day; and 2) oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 500 mg twice a day. 250 patients were evaluated following second line hormone therapy and, after cross-over, 128 following third line hormonotherapy. No significant difference was observed, during either second or third line therapies, for toxicity, survival, or response rate; however, in both second and third line therapies the median time to progression was significantly longer with Ag therapy.
为评估两种不同顺序的二线和三线激素疗法对绝经后晚期乳腺癌的疗效,257名年龄在36 - 91岁(平均年龄:63.6岁)、已对他莫昔芬(TAM)耐药的女性,进入一项多中心随机试验,比较两种不同方案:1)氨鲁米特(Ag)500毫克/天,加用30至60毫克/天的氢化可的松;2)口服醋酸甲羟孕酮(MPA)500毫克,每日两次。250例患者在二线激素治疗后接受评估,交叉治疗后,128例在三线激素治疗后接受评估。在二线或三线治疗期间,在毒性、生存率或缓解率方面未观察到显著差异;然而,在二线和三线治疗中,Ag治疗的疾病进展中位时间均显著延长。