Yashiro A, O'Neil J, Hoff H F
Department of Vascular Cell Biology and Atherosclerosis, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195.
J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 5;268(7):4709-15.
We investigated whether apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins could bind to the insoluble complexes of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) induced by Ca2+. Lp(a), but not low density lipoprotein (LDL), very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), or high density lipoprotein3 (HDL3) formed insoluble complexes at physiologic Ca2+ concentrations. Desialylation of Lp(a) dramatically decreased the ability of Lp(a) to aggregate, suggesting that sialic acids on Lp(a) were responsible for forming Ca2+ cross-bridges. Since a reduction of only 30% of the sialic acids on Lp(a) inhibited Ca(2+)-induced complex formation, it appears that only a small percentage of sialic acids on Lp(a) is involved in Ca(2+)-induced cross-bridging of Lp(a) particles. To determine whether other lipoproteins would complex to Lp(a) in the insoluble complexes, we mixed Lp(a) with LDL, VLDL, or HDL3 in the presence of Ca2+. Although both LDL and VLDL bound to the Lp(a) in the insoluble complexes, HDL3 not only did not bind, but it also prevented Lp(a) from forming insoluble complexes. LDL bound to Lp(a) in the insoluble complexes in a concentration-dependent manner, eventually reaching saturation at a molar ratio of 5:4 (LDL to Lp(a)). The interaction between LDL and Lp(a) appeared to be ionic, since increases in the positive charge on LDL by desialylation increased this interaction, whereas decreases in positive charge on LDL reduced this interaction. At higher Ca2+ concentrations, the binding of acetyl LDL to Lp(a) in the insoluble complexes was greater than that of LDL. Since more Ca2+ was required for concentration-dependent saturation of acetyl LDL binding, it is likely that Ca2+ cross-bridging was responsible for this binding. Thus, LDL, especially its modified forms, could contribute to the formation of insoluble complex of Lp(a) with Ca2+ in atherosclerotic lesions and help explain its preferential accumulation there.
我们研究了含载脂蛋白B的脂蛋白是否能与由Ca2+诱导形成的脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]不溶性复合物结合。在生理Ca2+浓度下,Lp(a)而非低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL)或高密度脂蛋白3(HDL3)形成了不溶性复合物。Lp(a)的去唾液酸化显著降低了Lp(a)聚集的能力,这表明Lp(a)上的唾液酸负责形成Ca2+交联桥。由于Lp(a)上仅30%的唾液酸减少就抑制了Ca(2+)诱导的复合物形成,似乎Lp(a)上只有一小部分唾液酸参与了Ca(2+)诱导的Lp(a)颗粒交联。为了确定其他脂蛋白是否会在不溶性复合物中与Lp(a)形成复合物,我们在Ca2+存在的情况下将Lp(a)与LDL、VLDL或HDL3混合。尽管LDL和VLDL都与不溶性复合物中的Lp(a)结合,但HDL3不仅不结合,而且还阻止Lp(a)形成不溶性复合物。LDL以浓度依赖的方式与不溶性复合物中的Lp(a)结合,最终在摩尔比为5:4(LDL与Lp(a))时达到饱和。LDL与Lp(a)之间的相互作用似乎是离子性的,因为LDL去唾液酸化导致其正电荷增加会增强这种相互作用,而LDL正电荷减少则会减弱这种相互作用。在较高的Ca2+浓度下,乙酰化LDL与不溶性复合物中Lp(a)的结合大于LDL。由于乙酰化LDL结合的浓度依赖性饱和需要更多的Ca2+,很可能是Ca2+交联桥导致了这种结合。因此,LDL,尤其是其修饰形式,可能在动脉粥样硬化病变中促成Lp(a)与Ca2+形成不溶性复合物,并有助于解释其在那里的优先积聚。