Yamagami C, Takao N, Fujita T
Kobe Women's College of Pharmacy, Japan.
J Pharm Sci. 1993 Feb;82(2):155-61. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600820208.
The logarithm of the 1-octanol-water partition coefficient value (log Poct) was compared with those from CHCl3-water (log PCL) and di-n-butyl ether-water (log PE) for (di)azines substituted singly by nonhydrogen-bonding and hydrogen-accepting substituents (2-substituted pyrazines, 2-substituted pyrimidines, 5-substituted pyrimidines, and 2-substituted pyridines). The difference between log Poct and log PCL for diazines was primarily governed by the number of hydrogen-bonding sites in the substituent. For 2-substituted pyridines, the difference in the hydrogen-bonding association of the ring N-atom with octanol from that with CHCl3 was also significant. In the relationship between log Poct and log PE, the hydrogen-bonding solvations of the ring N-atom(s), as well as the hydrogen-accepting substituent with octanol, should be taken into account because the butyl ether acts as a nonhydrogen-bonding solvent.
将单被非氢键合和氢受体取代基取代的(二)嗪(2-取代吡嗪、2-取代嘧啶、5-取代嘧啶和2-取代吡啶)的1-辛醇-水分配系数值的对数(log Poct)与氯仿-水(log PCL)和二正丁醚-水(log PE)的相应值进行比较。对于二嗪,log Poct与log PCL之间的差异主要由取代基中的氢键合位点数量决定。对于2-取代吡啶,环N原子与辛醇的氢键缔合与与氯仿的氢键缔合之间的差异也很显著。在log Poct与log PE的关系中,应考虑环N原子以及氢受体取代基与辛醇的氢键溶剂化作用,因为丁醚作为非氢键合溶剂。