Miller J H
Vascular Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia.
J Vasc Surg. 1993 Mar;17(3):546-58.
As the title suggests, this is an account of treating infected arterial grafts other than by the accepted methods of complete graft removal and revascularization with autogenous material or extraanatomic bypass.
Since 1973, 42 patients with infected arterial grafts (n = 35) or autogenous reconstructions (n = 7) were seen with false aneurysm, hemorrhage, or perigraft or perianastomotic pus and were treated by removal of the infected graft and immediate adjacent or in situ revascularization by polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in 39 cases and Dacron in three cases. Management plan included (1) removal of only the obviously infected part of the original graft, (2) obliteration of the infected anastomotic site, and (3) placement of the new PTFE graft in an adjacent clean or debrided route. So treated were 15 aortic Dacron grafts, 20 PTFE grafts (2 iliofemoral, 3 femorofemoral, and 15 femorodistal), and 7 autogenous reconstructions with bleeding. Partial graft salvage was attempted in 10 of 15 Dacron and 19 of 20 PTFE grafts.
Four patients required further removal of the original infected graft (three Dacron, one PTFE), giving an ultimate success rate of 7 of 15 Dacron and 18 of 20 PTFE grafts; two patients required further obliteration of the original adjacent infected arterial segment because of rebleeding. An additional PTFE segment was joined successfully to incorporated PTFE in all six repeat operations. Initial failure did not prejudice the outcome; direct arterial flow to at least midthigh level was preserved in 37 of the 42 patients for a mean period of 40 months (range 9 to 130 months). Three of the new PTFE grafts occluded and became infected, which led to amputation and one death at a secondary operation. Visceral complications caused the only two other deaths in the aortic group. Five late amputations (four below the knee and one above the knee) were required because of femorodistal graft occlusion.
Partial removal of infected grafts with adjacent or in situ replacement by PTFE is possible, simplifies management, and permits maintenance of distal circulation with low morbidity and mortality rates.
正如标题所示,本文介绍了除采用公认的完全移除移植物并用自体材料或解剖外旁路进行血运重建这些方法之外,对感染的动脉移植物的治疗情况。
自1973年以来,共诊治了42例伴有感染性动脉移植物(n = 35)或自体血管重建(n = 7)的患者,这些患者出现了假性动脉瘤、出血、移植物周围或吻合口周围积脓的情况。其中39例患者通过移除感染的移植物并立即用聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)进行邻近部位或原位血运重建,3例患者用涤纶进行重建。治疗方案包括:(1)仅切除原移植物明显感染的部分;(2)封闭感染的吻合部位;(3)将新的PTFE移植物置于邻近的清洁或清创后的路径。共治疗了15例主动脉涤纶移植物、20例PTFE移植物(2例髂股动脉、3例股股动脉和15例股腘动脉)以及7例伴有出血的自体血管重建。15例涤纶移植物中的10例以及20例PTFE移植物中的19例尝试进行了部分移植物挽救。
4例患者需要进一步切除原感染的移植物(3例涤纶移植物,1例PTFE移植物),最终15例涤纶移植物中有7例成功,20例PTFE移植物中有18例成功;2例患者因再次出血需要进一步封闭原邻近的感染动脉段。在所有6次重复手术中,额外的PTFE段均成功与已植入的PTFE连接。初期失败并未影响最终结果;42例患者中有37例至少保留了大腿中部水平的直接动脉血流,平均时间为40个月(范围9至130个月)。3例新的PTFE移植物发生闭塞并感染,导致截肢,1例患者在二次手术时死亡。主动脉组另外2例死亡由内脏并发症所致。因股腘动脉移植物闭塞,需要进行5例晚期截肢手术(4例膝关节以下,1例膝关节以上)。
部分切除感染的移植物并采用PTFE进行邻近部位或原位置换是可行的,简化了治疗过程,并能以较低的发病率和死亡率维持远端循环。