Suppr超能文献

采用双标记水技术测量静脉喂养患者的总能量消耗。

Total energy expenditure in intravenously fed patients measured by the doubly labeled water technique.

作者信息

Pullicino E, Coward A, Elia M

机构信息

Dunn Nutrition Unit, Medical Research Council, Cambridge, England.

出版信息

Metabolism. 1993 Jan;42(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(93)90172-k.

Abstract

The potential clinical use of the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique to measure total energy expenditure (TEE) in intravenously fed patients was assessed by applying the technique to 13 stable patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN). TEE was compared with resting energy expenditure (REE), which was measured using a ventilated hood (n = 13), and with 24-hour energy expenditure (24h EE) measured in a whole-body calorimeter (n = 6). Daily measurements of urinary enrichment in 2H and 18O showed predominantly small and covariant fluctuations in elimination rates of these two tracers. The standard error of the estimate (SEFCO2) for the CO2 production rate (FCO2), which includes additional errors due to variability in isotopic fractionation, was calculated to be 2.65% +/- 0.70% of FCO2. TPN-related changes in background isotopic enrichment in subjects who were not dosed with isotope virtually ceased 10 days after starting intravenous feeding. TEE (4.99 +/- 1.10 kJ/min), TEE/REE (1.21 +/- 0.16 kJ/min), TEE/basal metabolic rate (]BMR] 1.31 +/- 0.16 kJ/min), and TEE (isotopic)/24h EE (calorimetric; 1.07 +/- 0.18 kJ/min) showed wide variability. This study provides some evidence for the validity of the DLW method in selected patients receiving TPN, since significant deviations from the assumptions of the method were not found in the subjects studied. The error associated with 2H sequestration during fatty acid synthesis is likely to be small, but could not be accurately measured. The contributions of activity and thermogenesis to TEE varied greatly, but overlapped with those reported in normal subjects.

摘要

通过对13例接受全胃肠外营养(TPN)的稳定患者应用双标记水(DLW)技术,评估了该技术在静脉喂养患者中测量总能量消耗(TEE)的潜在临床应用。将TEE与使用通风罩测量的静息能量消耗(REE,n = 13)以及在全身热量计中测量的24小时能量消耗(24h EE,n = 6)进行比较。每日对尿中2H和18O富集度的测量显示,这两种示踪剂的消除率主要呈现小幅度且协变的波动。二氧化碳产生率(FCO2)的估计标准误差(SEFCO2),其中包括由于同位素分馏变异性导致的额外误差,经计算为FCO2的2.65%±0.70%。在未给予同位素的受试者中,与TPN相关的背景同位素富集度变化在开始静脉喂养10天后基本停止。TEE(4.99±1.10 kJ/分钟)、TEE/REE(1.21±0.16 kJ/分钟)、TEE/基础代谢率(BMR;1.31±0.16 kJ/分钟)以及TEE(同位素法)/24h EE(热量计法;1.07±0.18 kJ/分钟)显示出较大的变异性。本研究为DLW方法在选定的接受TPN患者中的有效性提供了一些证据,因为在所研究的受试者中未发现与该方法假设的显著偏差。脂肪酸合成过程中与2H螯合相关的误差可能较小,但无法准确测量。活动和产热对TEE的贡献差异很大,但与正常受试者报告的情况有重叠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验